- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: I love my Heaven77
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
>
> While I have no reason to disagree with your general comment, my
> colleague compared the flare performance of his 43 with that of h
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I love my Heaven77
I'm referring to linear distortion, not perspective distortion. My
20/2.8 shows nearly undetectable barrel dist.. FA 24/2 shows noticeable
one. I shoot mostly architecture and inter
on [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I love my Heaven77
As I understand it, distortion is _inevitable_ in a lens
as wide as 24mm, which is why, for example, a 35mm is better
for group portraits.
Winston wrote, in part:
>
As I understand it, distortion is _inevitable_ in a lens
as wide as 24mm, which is why, for example, a 35mm is better
for group portraits.
Winston wrote, in part:
I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:18, Winston wrote:
>
>> I
>> wished Pentax makes something wider than 31mm and longer than 100mm
>> Limited lenses. I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
>> and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
>
>Same he
On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:18, Winston wrote:
> I
> wished Pentax makes something wider than 31mm and longer than 100mm
> Limited lenses. I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
> and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
Same here, pity the 14/2.8 was a DA not a LTD :-(
Rob St
100mm
Limited lenses. I'm not satisfied with the FA 24/2. Too much distortion,
and sharpness could be better at wide f-stops.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I love my Heave
Likewise ... my 43mm ltd never showed a hint of flare under
any circumstance. I will, however, admit to using a
slightly larger/deeper lens hood than the standard one, but
not specifically for flare protection ... it was just easier
to use for my style of carrying and shooting.
William Robb wrote
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: I love my Heaven77
> Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
> >
> >> From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
> >
> > >
Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
>
>> From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
>
> > Isn't flare an issue with this lens?
>>
>> No.
>
>Sorry, it was the 43 that my colleague has problems with.
Wow. I've never had any flare problems with my 43 Limited a
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
> Subject: RE: I love my Heaven77
>
> > Isn't flare an issue with this lens?
>
> No.
Sorry, it was the 43 that my colleague has problems with.
Kostas
- Original Message -
From: "Derby Chang"
Subject: I love my Heaven77
>
> I think a black-ring UV filter looks terrible on it. Need to find a
> slim-line silver filter. Then I'll be set for my sisters wedding
(just a
> small matter of deciding what to wear).
Pentax makes a matching UV
12 matches
Mail list logo
