Re: LX v MX/ME-S (was Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, yet)

2001-09-16 Thread Peter Alling
Since the MX is a manual mechanical camera I would think that having exposure compensation would be redundant. I agree with most of Shel's other points, except that since the MX is all mechanical it gives you the full range of shutter speeds without batteries. At 08:33 AM 9/5/2001 -0700, you

RE: LX v MX/ME-S (was Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, yet)

2001-09-05 Thread Skofteland, Christian
Shel Belinkoff wrote: The LX allows the use of a grip without having to attach a winder, unlike the MX or ME-S. When I received my LX it had the Grip-B which I removed (along with the strap) as an ungainly eye-sore. Well, I didn't want to lose it so after playing with the

Re: LX v MX/ME-S (was Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me,yet)

2001-09-05 Thread Aaron Reynolds
Shel Belinkoff wrote: The interchangeable viewfinders are a wonderful and valuable feature that neither the MX nor the ME-S has. The interchangeable focusing screens on the LX are another great feature, which the MX has but with much more limited options, and the ME-S doesn't offer at all.