On 2/22/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it wouldn't cause lag or shutter delay (Any lag would be purely
> mechanical before the shutter trips and would already be present in the
> film body), the sync contact closes at the beginning of the exposure.
> Shutter speed is irrelevant to th
No it wouldn't cause lag or shutter delay (Any lag would be purely
mechanical before the shutter trips and would already be present in the
film body), the sync contact closes at the beginning of the exposure.
Shutter speed is irrelevant to the issue as well.
In fact this is how the original Kod
That's actually the DCS/c I mentioned, the DCS14 is based on the Nikon
F80 and was succeeded by the DCS/n and DCS/c (the latter based on the Sigma)
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
> The DCS 14c was based on a Sigma body with an EOS mount, possibly
> reverse engineered.
>
> Adam Maas wrote:
>> All t
That would produce the effect similar to digital point and shoots
where there would be a lag or shutter delay. Oh well, you do get to
use the M42s...
On 2/22/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you only use the sync for triggering, you aren't stuck with sync
> speed as the sensor doesn'
That would produce the effect similar to digital point and shoots
where there would be a lag or shutter delay... Oh well, you do get to
use the M42 lens.
On 2/22/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you only use the sync for triggering, you aren't stuck with sync
> speed as the sensor doe
The DCS 14c was based on a Sigma body with an EOS mount, possibly
reverse engineered.
Adam Maas wrote:
> All the Kodak DCS units were based on existing Nikon or Canon bodies,
> starting with the F3 in 1991. The sole exception is the DCS/c which was
> a Sigma body with a Canon bayonet on it.
>
>
If you only use the sync for triggering, you aren't stuck with sync
speed as the sensor doesn't care if the shutter opens fully, as long as
the sensor gets exposed.
I know there's somebody floating around the net who had a breadboarded
digital back for his Nikon F2 up and running, albeit not re
All the Kodak DCS units were based on existing Nikon or Canon bodies,
starting with the F3 in 1991. The sole exception is the DCS/c which was
a Sigma body with a Canon bayonet on it.
The DCS 600's (F5 based) and later were heavily modified bodies, but
earlier models were really just backs and p
Oh, I remember how the conversation ended: we pondered how to trigger
the electronics and decided that we can hotwire the flash sync. Piece
of cake. But then you're stuck shooting only at 1/60...
> (In the original thread someone said that it should be mentioned to
> Tamron before someone else s
Kodak DCS 460 (?) was based on an existing Nikon body (they later made
another model based on the EOS). Fuji evolved their FineFix DSLR
based on the same idea (also a Nikon body). I was sort of waiting for
something like that to happen to my MZ5n but I guess we were not much
of a "market" for the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: M42 digital camera ( was 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
There's a company that makes stereo cameras by &q
There's a company that makes stereo cameras by "mating" two 35mm SLRs
together. The lenses are identical, and hooked together so that the user
can zoom at the same time and focus at the same time. The RBT camera is
expensive, but a few members of my stereo club have purchased these
cameras. Don
12 matches
Mail list logo
