On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I consider myself a documentarian, not an artist. The point I wished to
> make was that, even with matrix metering and autofocusing, real life is
> difficult to capture accurately on film without periodic user intervention.
> It is a point that Herb K
Chris,
I consider myself a documentarian, not an artist. The point I wished to
make was that, even with matrix metering and autofocusing, real life is
difficult to capture accurately on film without periodic user intervention.
It is a point that Herb Keppler makes time and again in his Popular
Ph
Amateur hack!!
Norm
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> Lasse, (not too impressed by the various definitions and labeling of
>different kind of picture shooters.)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
vi
gt; From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: April 6, 2001 3:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye)
> >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: &qu
A scroll of mail from "Peter Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 6
Apr 2001 11:07:13 +0100
Read it? y
>My hand is raised too but I don't think a camera without a built in flash
>would sell in the popular market place. Perhaps a better solution would be
>to move the RTF away from the viewfinder. I
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 6, 2001 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Johnson" <[EMAI
- Original Message -
From: "William Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Show of
> hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n
> (or MZ-S for that matter) for a .98x magnification
> viewfinder? Mine's raised.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William in Utah.
>
Absolutely YES, but I suppose you
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 22:46:29 -0500, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
>
>>hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n
>>(or MZ-S for that matter) for a .98x magnification
>>viewfinder? Mine's raised.
I certainly would!
-
Jan van Wijk; www.
>I'm with you on this one. I think you're right about
>the magnification being higher than any other Pentax
>SLR, _and_, to my knowledge, it is the smallest full
>frame regular production 35mm SLR ever made. Show of
>hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n
>(or MZ-S for that matte
My hand is raised too but I don't think a camera without a built in flash
would sell in the popular market place. Perhaps a better solution would be
to move the RTF away from the viewfinder. I recently read that the MZ has a
"penta-mirror" not a pentaprism. Is that the cause of the poor viewfin
10 matches
Mail list logo
