i had for about 3 weeks both the A and the FA 50mm f2.8 macro. i never had the F
version.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "David Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "P. List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 22:04
Subject: Re: Macros -
HERB SAID:
my limited experience from the time i had both was that the
FA Macro was
sharper enough to see the difference in the viewfinder. its
manual focusing feel is
too loose even with the clutch to hold its position well when
pointed downwards.
the F is worse in this regard.
Herb
Hey
Alexander,
Thanks to you and the others for your opinions. I guess it
is mostly positive.
I am looking forward to its arrival.
Dave
ALEX Said:
The optical design of the F 50mm macro is isdentical
to that of the FA50mm macro. I have the FA version and
I rate it as a excellent. Macro shots
-Original Message-
> From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > The FA was the sharpest lense I owned, I think. Probably the only
> > sharper Pentax that I've had experience with is the 200 macro.
>
> Is that the A* or the FA*, Tom? I would say that the A* 200/4 Macro
> might be just a
Hi, Dave.
>> Does anyone have an opinion of the 50f2.8 F macro? I noticed
>> from Boz's page that it looks to have the same optics as the
>> FA. I think the "A" is the one with the reputation for being
>> extremely sharp--how does the "F" compare?
The F 50/2.8 Macro and the FA 50/2.8 Macro appe
> -Original Message-
> From: David Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have an opinion of the 50f2.8 F macro? I noticed
> from Boz's page that it looks to have the same optics as the
> FA. I think the "A" is the one with the reputation for being
> extremely sharp
6 matches
Mail list logo
