C> **A guy called ZAC told me that I'd need to use my BRAIN for the ZONE
C> system**
C> ;-)
C> Cotty
Hah! Easy Cotty ;-)
Zenza Bronica.
Which one?
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forge
So, which one? An ETRs or an SQ-A? Or something older?
Gianfranco
(do I win something??)
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **A guy called ZAC told me that I'd need to use my BRAIN for
the ZONE
> system**
=
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
-
T
>Come on Cotty!!! What is it? Or are you too ashamed?
Pretty ashamed. I wish I could stretch to a Pentax but, I need to keep
costs as low as possible for the time being. If I can live with MF then
doubtless in future I would consider a Pentax 645.
Regarding mirrors and TLRs - - *I* didn't say
Shel scribbled...
> PMFJI, but why would you need MLU on a Rolleiflex? They don't have a
> mirror.
Ah, but they do have a mirror, is just isn't a moving one. :-)
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and f
PMFJI, but why would you need MLU on a Rolleiflex? They don't have a
mirror.
Cotty wrote:
> >Ah. An old Rolleiflex!
>
> I nearly went that way. But if I'm going to take landscapes I need mirror
> lock-up...
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http
In a message dated 4/20/2002 5:47:04 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Ah. An old Rolleiflex!
>
> I nearly went that way. But if I'm going to take landscapes I need mirror
> lock-up...
>
Not with a TLR, you wouldn't.
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at htt
What you need mirror lock-up on a TLR for???
And now for my guess - Kiev?
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 12:46 AM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Re: New Camera, New Format
>> >> &g
Think entry level of quality...
>
>
A Mamiya TLR, perhaps a C220.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>that sounds like rolleicord? do i get a candy?
No no no!
A guy called Zac told me that I'd have to use my Brain for the Zone
system...
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macin
>> >> > >Cotty has a Lubitel?
>> >> >
>> >> > Nope.
>> >>
>> >> Pentacon 6?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Maybe a Yashica Mat? (Surely *not* a Seagull TLR.)
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> I said cheap, but I said quality also. Think entry level of quality...
>
>Ah. An old Rolleiflex!
I nearly went that way. But if I'm
>Diana?
Pardon me?
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://ww
At 05:49 PM 4/20/02 -0400, you wrote:
>From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: New Camera, New Format
>
> >> > >Cotty has a Lubitel?
> >> >
> >> > Nope.
> >>
> >> Pentacon 6?
> >>
> >
> >Maybe a
that sounds like rolleicord? do i get a candy?
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: New Camera, New Format
> Nope.
>
> I said cheap, b
In a message dated 4/20/2002 9:09:38 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >Cotty has a Lubitel?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Pentacon 6?
>
Maybe a Yashica Mat? (Surely *not* a Seagull TLR.)
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at http://members.aol.com/ernreed
-
This mess
> >Cotty has a Lubitel?
>
> Nope.
Pentacon 6?
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>Cotty has a Lubitel?
Nope.
:-)
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
g
April 19, 2002 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: New camera, new format.
> - Original Message -
> From: Jeff
> Subject: Re: New camera, new format.
>
> >
> > > > Which one do you want? The F4/100mm or F4/135mm? According
> to the specs,
> > > > the closest focus
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: New camera, new format.
>
> > > Which one do you want? The F4/100mm or F4/135mm? According
to the specs,
> > > the closest focussing distance is 443 mm resp 750 mm.
>
> It sounds more like CF than macro. How do these
> Aaron wrote:
>
>> We're coming for you, next, Cotty! Just think of how light
>> the 67 is in comparison to those Betacams...
>
> all this apprehension concerning the weight of the 6x7 is
> folderol & balderdash - not only is the filmgate the ideal
> format, but the mass has a
>>> Way to go, Malcolm! Welcome to the Brotherhood!
>>
>> Oh Lord.
>
>We're coming for you, next, Cotty! Just think of how light the 67 is in
>comparison to those Betacams...
Cotty: 'No, you'll never get me. Stay back, stay back I say! No!
N!!!
AAARRGGGHHH
Jeff wrote:
> Brother Bill,
> Does Brother Aaron give you a commission for every convert?
nah - he's a relative newbie, but he has great enthusiasm! :^)
I've been convinced of the 6x7's superiority for ~20yrs.
In fact, I used medium formats for many years before even
Brother Bill,
Does Brother Aaron give you a commission for every convert?
> > Which one do you want? The F4/100mm or F4/135mm? According to the specs,
> > the closest focussing distance is 443 mm resp 750 mm.
It sounds more like CF than macro. How do these numbers translate to image
magnificati
Aaron wrote:
> We're coming for you, next, Cotty! Just think of how light
> the 67 is in comparison to those Betacams...
all this apprehension concerning the weight of the 6x7 is
folderol & balderdash - not only is the filmgate the ideal
format, but the mass has also b
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 05:20 PM, Cotty wrote:
>> Way to go, Malcolm! Welcome to the Brotherhood!
>
> Oh Lord.
We're coming for you, next, Cotty! Just think of how light the 67 is in
comparison to those Betacams...
-Brother Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: New camera, new format.
> I hope you are not in dialogue with the flushing item!
>
> If you want to make a point - go for me, easy target, new 67
owner.
>
> I am mostly committed to 35mm film - sorry we have falle
>PS Surprised at Cotty's comments - I will not be acquiring another camera
>for years - sorry if you think I was OTT. Next time you see one of my posts,
>just delete it without reading it. Big camera event for me, my apologies.
Malcolm, don't mistake my sad and twisted sense of humour for anythin
Malcolm,
It seems that once you seriously look at the 67, it suddenly feels
just right. What a beautiful camera and format! Welcome to the
brother/sisterhood.
Brother Bruce
Thursday, April 18, 2002, 5:31:57 AM, you wrote:
MS> Well, I've done it now and become a Pentax fanatic in 35mm and
>Well, I've done it now and become a Pentax fanatic in 35mm and medium
>format. I am now looking at a 6x7 with 105mm lens - very nice too. It was
>too good a deal to pass on.
>
>Despite all the comments about its size, I didn't need to remove the front
>door, to get it into the house!
>
>As the su
Way to go, Malcolm! Welcome to the Brotherhood!
-Brother Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
29 matches
Mail list logo
