This morning I received a surprise from Newegg, the store from which I
bought the SD card. They have sent me a free gift. Gee, for a $45.00
purchase that's amazing. The tracking info says the package weighs in at
between 1- and 2-lbs. I wonder what it could be ;-))
Shel
And you're complaining about a few seconds or minutes when it used to
take at minimum an hour, if not a day or multiple days to get film back?
Shame on you. ;-)
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: New
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
older/crappier one.
I just ordered a small SD card reader/jump drive for $6. We'll see how
fast it
Mat Maessen wrote:
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
older/crappier one.
I just ordered a small SD card reader/jump drive for $6.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:43AM -0800, David Oswald wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote:
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
That sounds like you're getting the same throughput as I see with a
Belkin USB 2.0 card reader and a 2G Sandisk Ultra II CF card: about 5
minutes for a complete, full card download.
The differential from USB 2.0 to USB 1.1 is typically about 30-40x in
transfer time. Cardbus should allow a
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II. Which is where
the performance bottleneck comes in. The Kingston cards (I've got a 1GB
CF unit) are solidly middle of the road for performance.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That sounds like you're getting the same throughput as I see
Mine (an Elite Pro 2GB) claims to be a 50x card.
The comparison tests Shel posted recently measured this card
at 9.6MB/Sec - not the 12.5MB/Sec of the fastest cards, perhaps,
but a little better than middle-of-the-road if you ask me.
In any case, it's more than fast enough for my *ist-D, and I'm
On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II.
Which Kingston cards -- the slow ones or the fast ones?
-Aaron
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II.
Which Kingston cards -- the slow ones or the fast ones?
-Aaron
The fast ones. Good, but not spectacular, unlike the Ultra II, which is
typically one of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
