Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

I'v been a bit tardy on commwnting on your recent shots Godder, but this one i like. The lines of the couch meeting up with the more plain wall is interesting Dave On 11/20/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

In a message dated 11/20/2007 5:13:15 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Only a few weeks to go in 2007... http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. enjoy Godfrey = It's a nice capture, but rather static.

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

There's too much tension with his foot _almost_ touching the edge of the frame. Some more space on that side would've done it good. Nice tones though. Cheers, Paul Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > > Comment

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > looks staged to me, Godders... or at least she knew you were taking > the > photo... > so not so interesting as your other work , to me. Interesting comment. It wasn't staged. These two boys were

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > >Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > >enjoy >Godfrey > > > looks staged to me, Godders... or at least she knew you were taking the photo... so not so interesting as yo

Re: PAW 2007 - 48 - GDG

That's a really good pic. Nicely composed, and it piques curiosity... Rick --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only a few weeks to go in 2007... > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfrey > >

Re: PAW 2007 - 47 - GDG

Thanks Paul. Yes, the way the verticals try to combat each other is one of the things that drew my eye in to the scene! I'd been walking with the FA43 on the camera, switched to the DA21 for this shot. :-) Godfrey On Nov 12, 2007, at 11:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nicely rendered, bu

Re: PAW 2007 - 47 - GDG

In a message dated 11/12/2007 11:10:01 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So much for minimalism... http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47.htm Comments and critique always appreciated. Godfrey == Funny. They are coming to get us! I am bothered by the patt

Re: PAW 2007 - 47 - GDG

Nicely rendered, but I find it uncomfortable to view. The verticals seem to be fighting each other. Paul -- Original message -- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > So much for minimalism... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/47.htm > > Co

Re: PAW 2007 - 46 - GDG

Nice light and very nicely framed, Godfrey. Perhaps a half stop darker would be better...? Rick --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Continuing apace with more work from recent sessions > ... > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46.htm > > Comments, critique, etc a

Re: PAW 2007 - 46 - GDG

On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:53, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Continuing apace with more work from recent sessions ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. Keys a plus. > Yikes! Color! I thought you had one of them-thar monochrome K10Ds.

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

From: ann sanfedele > John Sessoms wrote: > >> From: ann sanfedele >>> Yes - and that is why it is such an fine and interesting photo, I think... >>> and I just remembered >>> the film it also reminds me of (besides the Body snatcher pods) - >>> "Pleasantville" >>> >> >> Diffre

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

John Sessoms wrote: >From: ann sanfedele > > > >>John Sessoms wrote: >> >> >> >>>From: ann sanfedele >>> >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm > >Comme

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:27 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm > > Diffrent strokes for diffrent folks. It just doesn't do anything > for me. > > I go back to it with everyone's comments. I look at it, I try to > appreciate it, but I just don't see any

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

From: ann sanfedele > John Sessoms wrote: > >> From: ann sanfedele >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. enjoy Godfrey >>>

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Christian wrote: >ann sanfedele wrote: > > >>John Sessoms wrote: >> >> > > > >>>I've looked it over again and again, and it just don't look natural. >>> >>>Everything looks posed, including the picket fence, the hedge and the >>>house. It's just so flat, like a natural history museum dior

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

On 30/10/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >>Tom - I told you, they are pod people :) > >They're Canon users??? LOL oh that's sweet -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PD

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

In a message dated 10/30/2007 10:39:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: more than that, how about "The Truman Show" where everything WAS choreographed. -- Christian == Yes. Marnie aka Doe :-) - Warning: I am now

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

John Sessoms wrote: > > I've looked it over again and again, and it just don't look natural. > > Everything looks posed, including the picket fence, the hedge and the > house. It's just so flat, like a natural history museum diorama ... > > "Homo Sapiens - ca 2007 CE" > That's what I LIKE ab

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

ann sanfedele wrote: > John Sessoms wrote: >>> >> I've looked it over again and again, and it just don't look natural. >> >> Everything looks posed, including the picket fence, the hedge and the >> house. It's just so flat, like a natural history museum diorama ... >> >> "Homo Sapiens - ca 2007 C

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

John Sessoms wrote: >From: ann sanfedele > > > >>Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> >> >>>On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... >>> >>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm >>> >>>Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. >>> >>>enjoy >>>Godfrey >>> >>> >>> >>> >

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

From: "Tom C" > Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in time and > space? ;-) Museum display - "California People: early 21st century" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

-- Original message -- From: John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> joy > > I've looked it over again and again, and it just don't look natural. > > Everything looks posed, including the picket fence, the hedge and the > house. It's just so flat, like a natural histor

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

From: ann sanfedele > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm >> >> Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. >> >> enjoy >> Godfrey >> >> >> > OMYGOD - its the pod people! > > Is this your scary

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Mark Roberts wrote: >ann sanfedele wrote: > > > >>>On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom C wrote: >>> >>> >>>Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in >>>time and space? ;-) >>> >>> >>Tom - I told you, they are pod people :) >> >> > >They're Canon users??? > >

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

ann sanfedele wrote: >>On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom C wrote: > >>Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in >>time and space? ;-) > >Tom - I told you, they are pod people :) They're Canon users??? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/l

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

>Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > >Shutter speed. > > > >G > > > >On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > > > > > >>Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in time > >>and > >>space? ;-) > >> > >> > >Tom - I told you, they are pod people :) > >ann > Good one Ann. I like bot

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Shutter speed. > >G > >On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > >>Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in time >>and >>space? ;-) >> >> Tom - I told you, they are pod people :) ann > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@p

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Shutter speed. G On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom C wrote: > Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in time > and > space? ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Why are all those people standing there like they're frozen in time and space? ;-) Tom C. >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG >Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:38:09 -070

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

That is amazing! Jack --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some photos elicit a lot of commentary and others none. I've gotten > over 70 comments from people on this one! That's just amazing. > > Thank you all. > > Godfrey > > >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.ht

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Some photos elicit a lot of commentary and others none. I've gotten over 70 comments from people on this one! That's just amazing. Thank you all. Godfrey >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm > >Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. > >enjoy >Godfrey > > > OMYGOD - its the pod people! Is this your scary Halloween time shot, Godders? Be afraid be ve

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

keith_w wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm >> >> Comments, critique, etc. always appreciate

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm > > Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfre

RE: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

1st class. Great light, good little moment, like choreography. -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi > Sent: 29 October 2007 19:55 > To: DUG; PDML List; PAW; SeePhoto Talk > Subject: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG > > On

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Interesting scene. Excellent tonality. The car is a bit unfortunate, but by no means a deal breaker. Good one. Paul -- Original message -- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ra

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

Actually, the car could be cloned out. Constructing the back of the shoe would take a bit of work, but the rest of it is a cakewalk. Paul -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL P

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm > > Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfre

Re: PAW 2007 - 45 - GDG

In a message dated 10/29/2007 1:02:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On my way to Sausalito last Friday evening ... http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/45.htm Comments, critique, etc. always appreciated. enjoy Godfrey = That's a very odd shot, God

Re: PAW 2007 - 44 - GDG

The patterns and B&W treatment on this one are very appealing to me. Well done. -- Bruce Monday, October 22, 2007, 11:52:46 PM, you wrote: GD> I went to Berkeley yesterday for a talk by reknowned documentarian GD> photographer Danny Lyon. Didn't want to carry much or do very much GD> photograp

Re: PAW 2007 - 44 - GDG

In a message dated 10/23/2007 12:03:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I went to Berkeley yesterday for a talk by reknowned documentarian photographer Danny Lyon. Didn't want to carry much or do very much photography so I grabbed the L1 and the Nikkor 20, snapped a fe

Re: PAW 2007 - 44 - GDG

On 10/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I went to Berkeley yesterday for a talk by reknowned documentarian > photographer Danny Lyon. Didn't want to carry much or do very much > photography so I grabbed the L1 and the Nikkor 20, snapped a few > shots here and there. This one, tak

Re: PAW 2007 - 44 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > I went to Berkeley yesterday for a talk by reknowned documentarian > photographer Danny Lyon. Didn't want to carry much or do very much > photography so I grabbed the L1 and the Nikkor 20, snapped a few > shots here and there. This one, taken downstairs in the hall a

Re: PAW 2007 - 44 - GDG

and well spotted too. Just sufficiently abstract to keep the viewer guessing. I agree that the larger rendering is better - it gives the panes a more vivid 'glow'. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianw

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

I have no idea what you're seeing, Ken. I've punched the photo around every which way I can think of with CS2 and cannot make any magenta band stand out. A Color Selection command does not show anything magenta in the image file either. Do me a favor: Make it stand out, have whatever palette

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

- but glad it seems machine related and not your eyes ann > > >- Original Message - >From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > > > > >>Kenneth Waller wrote: >> >> >> >>>"an

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

I see the band your referring to, but I don't see any colour cast to it. Cheers, Dave On 10/21/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Understand I'm being "mom"here -- what does the missus see? > > I understand. > Just called my wife in to look & she sees it without any prompting from

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > It could be your monitor, Ken. I can't see the streak under any > conditions, even after upsizing the image in PS. > Paul > On Oct 19, 2

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

rstand I can see it when I only view it on Godfrey's posting. Should it be there if its a greyscale image - I don't know. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 4

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

> Perhaps it is an artifact on your screen??? Then I should see it on other images. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > Ken, > I don't see it on

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

esponse, the very slight magenta streak > runs > from the ULH side to the LRH corner. Its in the area between the > dark sky & > light. And yes, I still see it. > > > Kenneth Waller > http://tinyurl.com/272u2f > > > - Original Message - > From: &quo

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

It's ok... I've hunted for it with a sampler and can't find it. But if you see it, I suppose it's there somehow. Very odd. Godfrey > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/43.htm > >> As I stated in my original response, the very slight magenta >> streak runs >> from the ULH side to the L

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

om"here -- what does the missus see? ann > >Kenneth Waller >http://tinyurl.com/272u2f > > >- Original Message - >From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > > > > >>Kenneth Waller wrote:

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

streak runs > from the ULH side to the LRH corner. Its in the area between the dark sky & > light. And yes, I still see it. > > > Kenneth Waller > http://tinyurl.com/272u2f > > > - Original Message - > From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > Kenneth Waller wrote: > >>>I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going blind >>>or Ken needs a trip to >>>the eye doctor ;) >>> >>>

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

course, looking at the screen and away at something else, or vice versa, could bring it about... where is the streak you see? do you still see it? ann > > >- Original Message - >From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail Li

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

ttp://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:23 AM Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >>I don't either; it's a gray

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going > blind > or Ken needs a trip to the eye doctor ;) Well, at very least I'm not an old blind republican. Two out of three aint bad though. ]'-) > godders, this isn't my kind

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

While the trails off the back of the jet are somewhat interesting, this one just doesn't grab me at all. The placement of the jet by the trees seems a bit strange. -- Bruce Thursday, October 18, 2007, 4:57:25 PM, you wrote: GD> Been a slow week, dealing with business and bronchitis (yuck), so

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >I don't either; it's a grayscale rendering .. ?? > >Godfrey > I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going blind or Ken needs a trip to the eye doctor ;) godders, this isn't my kind of picture, either, and given my proximity to certain structures in

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

I don't either; it's a grayscale rendering .. ?? Godfrey On Oct 18, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Hi Ken, > I don't see a magenta band. But I frequently miss things other people > see. > Paul > On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > >> As posted, it has a very light mag

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

Thanks Paul. The Guadalupe River Park is right next to San Jose Airport. My walk takes me right under the flight path for the main runway, so there's a jet coming in about every 20 minutes or so. I live about 10 miles from there. Moffet Field and NASA Ames are four miles from my door, but o

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

Nice. Well composed. You apparently are close to the end of a runway. Obviously, that isn't entirely a bad thing:-). Good one. Paul On Oct 18, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Been a slow week, dealing with business and bronchitis (yuck), so I > haven't been out shooting much. This is

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

Hi Ken, I don't see a magenta band. But I frequently miss things other people see. Paul On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > As posted, it has a very light magenta band to it running from ULH > to LRH > corner. > The subject matter is un-interesting to me & I'm a little in a

Re: PAW 2007 - 43 - GDG

As posted, it has a very light magenta band to it running from ULH to LRH corner. The subject matter is un-interesting to me & I'm a little in a quandary as to the composition. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

> > I just noticed something. Does it look to anyone else like giant chopsticks > are grasping the kid's head? Perhaps it's just my over-active imagination. You're a sick man John. John Celio wrote: >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm >> >> Comments, critique, etc always app

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. Although I can see why other people wouldn't dig it, I like this image. The child's gesture is cute and endearing, and I love the colors and stark contrast between top and bottom. I just noti

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

In a message dated 10/9/2007 2:23:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The subject merge with the column ruins this for me. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f = Sorry, ditto. Marnie aka Doe - Warning: I am

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

The subject merge with the column ruins this for me. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG > Hope you enjoy ... > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > Comments, cr

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > You probably know this, but of course I imagined you were clicking > away > at the scene , as you describe, > but you chose this one in the selection process, indicating you > (and I)

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >>>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm >>> >>> >From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Jaume Lahuerta wrote: >> >>>What a shame those (table legs?) just above the child's head... >>> >>> >>> ann said: >>I sure disagree - The legs fram

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

On 10/9/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hope you enjoy ... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. Incredible shot!!! Amazing light and composition. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Ditto. Cheers, Dave On 10/9/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool concept, well rendered. Unfortunate placement of the table legs. > Paul > On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:27 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Bit of an 'almost there' type of shot. You caught the child just perfect with the finger pointing and the silhouette works well. What hurts the shot are the black posts that come down through the child's head. They really weaken the finger pointing and the child. It is still a good shot, just n

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm Thank you all for the comments and compliments! Some notes below ... From: Michael Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > First this in an intriguing image. Lot of mystery and room for > personal interpretation/involvement in the scene. Second, I wonder

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Jaume Lahuerta wrote: >What a shame those (table legs?) just above the child's head... > >This case is the limit that I would allow my self to edit (removing those >table legs), since I think that the picture deserves the effort. >What about you? Also, maybe I would crop a bit in the bottom, but

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Very nice. Is that the actual color or did you do a B&W conversion and tint it? --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hope you enjoy ... > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > enjoy! > Godfrey > > -- > PDM

re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Quite unexpected use of a floor as reflective surface and very pleasant framing. -- new photos once and again... roman.blakout.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

Cool concept, well rendered. Unfortunate placement of the table legs. Paul On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:27 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Hope you enjoy ... > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > enjoy! > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-

Re: PAW 2007 - 42 - GDG

What a shame those (table legs?) just above the child's head... This case is the limit that I would allow my self to edit (removing those table legs), since I think that the picture deserves the effort. What about you? Also, maybe I would crop a bit in the bottom, but this may be caused by my m

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Hi Godfrey, Sorry, something doesn't quite work for me in this shot. I am not sure what it is - the subject, the framing, the focus point, or all together. I have a few of my own shots of flowers where I have this feeling that something is not quite right. I like the "Rope Coil" shot - there is s

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Godfrey, It looks to me as though the plane of focus is through that leaf at about 10 o'clock, and that the flowers are a little soft. I like the colors and composition, though. My fisheye zoom is my second-most-used lens. Rick --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another fish-ey

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

In a message dated 9/30/2007 9:00:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What Bruce said. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f === What he said. Marnie aka Doe ;-) - Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Thanks for your interest. This particular photo was made with an Pentax M42 Fish-Eye-Takumar 17mm f/4, fitted to a Panasonic L1 (4/3 System format). This one:

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

What Bruce said. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG > Yes, I don't see they fisheye effect, but the shot really doesn't do > anything for me.

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

I think he's using the smc p 17mm f4.0 on a reduced frame dslr. It just looks like a lot of barrel distortion, and is only noticeable if there's a straight line near the edge of the frame. Something this shot avoids entirely. Bruce Dayton wrote: > Yes, I don't see they fisheye effect, but the s

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

I find the background distracting. Not a pleasing bokeh. paul -- Original message -- From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the > > curvilinear aspect of this lens almost comp

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Yes, I don't see they fisheye effect, but the shot really doesn't do anything for me. -- Bruce Sunday, September 30, 2007, 2:31:19 PM, you wrote: GD> Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the GD> curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: GD>http://homepage

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the > curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: > >http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/41.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > best, > Godfrey > Excellent, I would

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

On Sep 30, 2007, at 3:17 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: >> Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the >> curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/41.htm > > indeed - are those lantana? Haven't the foggiest really. Th

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the >curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/41.htm > >Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > >best, >Godfrey > > > indeed - are those lan

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

On Sep 30, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Cotty wrote: >> Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the >> curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/41.htm > > I really like this photograph. Thank you! I hope so ... This fishy

Re: PAW 2007 - 41 - GDG

On 30/09/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >Another fish-eye flower shot ... these sorts of subjects hide the >curvilinear aspect of this lens almost completely: > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/41.htm > >Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. I really like

Re: PAW 2007 - 40 - GDG

Great shot, Godfrey! --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in San Francisco: > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/40.htm > > Comments, critique, and a shoe shine always > appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfrey >www.gdgphoto.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

Re: PAW 2007 - 40 - GDG

This one I like - it really shows the feelings of the individuals. Nicely done, Godfrey! -- Bruce Sunday, September 23, 2007, 3:58:58 PM, you wrote: GD> in San Francisco: GD>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/40.htm GD> Comments, critique, and a shoe shine always appreciated. G

Re: PAW 2007 - 39 - GDG

>Something a little new, from a morning walk ... > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/39.htm >Comments, critique and a quiet cup of tea always appreciated. I like this picture; it makes me wonder where the path leads, and I really like the textures. I've got some green tea with jasmin

Re: PAW 2007 - 39 - GDG

On 18/09/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: >Cotty wrote: >> On 18/09/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> (And I still won't see either, because I don't have an "artists eye" >>> or whatever you want to call the ability to see something "artistic" or >>> interesting in or

Re: PAW 2007 - 39 - GDG

On 18/09/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: >Who would be so lame as to put a freaking cormorant on a magazine cover? Mark! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pe

Re: PAW 2007 - 39 - GDG

On 9/18/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh crikey. Cue the magazine cover!! Who would be so lame as to put a freaking cormorant on a magazine cover? cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >