Cotty,
It's all about the Benjamins...
http://tinyurl.com/m7d5x
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/7/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/4/07, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >To the victor, the right to write the history.
> >
> >Treason doth never prosper.
> >What's the reason?
> >Why,
Bitter, apparently. Ever since the colonies revolted:-)).
Paul
On Apr 7, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 7/4/07, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> To the victor, the right to write the history.
>>
>> Treason doth never prosper.
>> What's the reason?
>> Why, if it prosper,
>> None d
On 7/4/07, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>To the victor, the right to write the history.
>
>Treason doth never prosper.
>What's the reason?
>Why, if it prosper,
>None durst call it treason.
>Anon
>
>John
John! How ya bin chap ?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | Peop
To the victor, the right to write the history.
Treason doth never prosper.
What's the reason?
Why, if it prosper,
None durst call it treason.
Anon
John
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:33:33 +0100, P. J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There were plenty of British Loyalists available, and a few
There were plenty of British Loyalists available, and a few atrocities
from both sides, mostly in the Carolinas. The British perpetrated ones
are better known, possibly because they were actually worse, possibly not.
John Forbes wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:51:52 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROT
On 6/4/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Cotty, think 1776
Beer?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Yep,
Most of them would form the core populations of Upper Canada, Nova
Scotia and New Brunswick after the rebellion.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Not so. There were numerous British civilians in the colonies who
> were loyal to the crown. The revolt was not unanimous by any means.
> Paul
>
>From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO: Ben Does Starbucks
>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:29:01 -0400
>
>I ran into the fellow again this afternoon. Gave him the pic, and he
>promis
Not so. There were numerous British civilians in the colonies who
were loyal to the crown. The revolt was not unanimous by any means.
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 3:13 PM, John Forbes wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:51:52 +0100, graywolf
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> One side's patriot is the o
I ran into the fellow again this afternoon. Gave him the pic, and he
promised to contract me to shoot his children. Turns out his name is
Marty, and he's in real estate.
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 1:20 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> Thanks Christian. I printed it on Velvet
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:51:52 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One side's patriot is the other side's traitor. One side's freedom
> fighter is the other side's terrorist*. However, old Ben was never a
> combatant. Much worse, he was a diplomat encouraging the King's more
> dangerous ene
On 4/7/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's special:-).
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Okay, I give up Paul. This a minor US celeb or something? Quick
> >explanation
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>Thanks Christian. I printed it on Velvet Fine Art this morning. I'm
>pleased.
>Paul
>
Maybe you could then get it painted on black velvet, after you put the
color back in, of course :) :)
as to the photo - yeah, fun -
ann
>On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Christian wrote
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>Paul,
>
>That's an "electrifying" portrait.
>
>-Brendan
>
>
And you didn't even need a plug-in to view it!
ann
>--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ben does Starbucks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
Cotty wrote:
>On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's special:-).
>>
>>
>
>Okay, I give up Paul. This a minor US celeb or something? Quick
>explanation for The Rest Of The World please ;-)
>
>
>
Cotty, think 1776
ann
Very good!
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Alternate title: "Ben there, done latte"
> :-p
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/lis
One side's patriot is the other side's traitor. One side's freedom
fighter is the other side's terrorist*. However, old Ben was never a
combatant. Much worse, he was a diplomat encouraging the King's more
dangerous enemies, the French.
*To the best of my knowledge the rebels (revolutionists, si
You should thank Franklin. If it weren't for his treason to the crown,
the British wouldn't have adopted positive ground electrics, leading
ultimately to Lucas and all those wonderful jokes about the Prince of
Darkness.
Cotty wrote:
> On 5/4/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Ame
Thanks Christian. I printed it on Velvet Fine Art this morning. I'm
pleased.
Paul
On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Christian wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>> Ben does Starbucks.
>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5812381&size=lg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> Ben does Starbucks.
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5812381&size=lg
I like it, Paul. Nice lighting and well framed.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
Bob W wrote:
>
> It's Benjamin Franklin,
> terrorist,
We prefer "freedom fighter" or "patriot" :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Alternate title: "Ben there, done latte"
:-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like thi sone Paul, good angle, nice position and conversion.
I still don't know if i could do this type of shooting, but maybe i'll
try next week.
Dave
On 4/5/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> > Ben does Starbucks.
> > http
HAR!
On Apr 6, 2007, at 4:21 AM, Bob W wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Cotty
>> Sent: 05 April 2007 23:42
>> To: pentax list
>> Subject: Re: PESO: Ben Does Starbucks
>>
>
On 6/4/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Buck your ideas up, man. Everybody knows that Americans know nothing
>about the rest of the world, while Europeans are highly educated about
>everything - you're letting the side down. It's Benjamin Franklin,
>terrorist, as any fule kno. I spotted him
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Cotty
> Sent: 05 April 2007 23:42
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: PESO: Ben Does Starbucks
>
> On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Thanks f
On 5/4/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>America gets no credit. Don't you know ANYTHING Cotty? Before Al Gore
>could invent the internet, Ben Franklin had to invent electricity.
So like I said, a minor US celeb.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
I know one guy who has his long hair wrapped around the top of his
head. That way when people who think he has a bad toupee, ask, he
truthfully answers "No, it's my own hair."
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Just curious, what might that "or something" be?
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> F
In a sense, every style is an affectation of sorts. I think this
fellow looks good, curls and all. But I do wonder if he has to set
his hair in rollers:-).
Paul
On Apr 5, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Just curious, what might that "or something" be?
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>> [Original Mess
ROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Re: PESO: Ben Does Starbucks
>
>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if people make comments to him about the resemblance?
>
> It looks like a deliberate affectation, actually. My initial
> impression was
> that the guy is part of a theater g
Thanks. I have one that shows more of the back page but less of his
face.
Paul
On Apr 5, 2007, at 8:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 4/5/2007 3:06:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> Ben does St
In a message dated 4/5/2007 6:02:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just curious, what might that "or something" be?
Shel
===
A snood.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Is there any other kind?
Shel
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It looks like a deliberate affectation, actually.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Just curious, what might that "or something" be?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> =
> Could be. Most guys don't wear their hair quite that long. Or if they
do,
> it's in a pony tail or something.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
In a message dated 4/5/2007 5:42:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like a deliberate affectation, actually. My initial impression was
that the guy is part of a theater group or some such.
William Robb
=
Could be. Most guys don't wear their hair quit
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Ben Does Starbucks
>
>
> I wonder if people make comments to him about the resemblance?
It looks like a deliberate affectation, actually. My initial impression was
that the guy is part of a theater gro
In a message dated 4/5/2007 3:06:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Ben does Starbucks.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5812381&size=lg
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdm
--- graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The guy resembles portraits of Ben Franklin, one of
> the guys that was
> more than incidental in taking the US away from your
> King. Also the guy
> that started the Saturday Evening Post.
>
Not to mention an inventor (bifocals, the lightning
rod,
He looks like Ben Franklin, one of our founding fathers and a
populist philosopher and scientist of sort.
Paul
On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's special:-).
>
> Okay, I give up Pa
The guy resembles portraits of Ben Franklin, one of the guys that was
more than incidental in taking the US away from your King. Also the guy
that started the Saturday Evening Post.
Any other questions? Try googling!
Cotty wrote:
> On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Okay, I give up Paul. This a minor US celeb or
> something? Quick
> >explanation for The Rest Of The World please ;-)
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >Cheers,
> > Cotty
> >
> >
>
> America gets no credit. Don't you know ANYTHING
> Cotty? Before Al Gore
> could in
>Okay, I give up Paul. This a minor US celeb or something? Quick
>explanation for The Rest Of The World please ;-)
>
>--
>
>
>Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
America gets no credit. Don't you know ANYTHING Cotty? Before Al Gore
could invent the internet, Ben Franklin had to invent electricity.
Tom C.
On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's special:-).
Okay, I give up Paul. This a minor US celeb or something? Quick
explanation for The Rest Of The World please ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pa
Special? You said it. That picture is probably worth a
$100.
;-]
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's
> special:-).
> Paul
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
>
> > Paul,
> >
> > That's an "electrifying" portrai
Thanks for looking. Had to shoot this guy. He's special:-).
Paul
On Apr 5, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> Paul,
>
> That's an "electrifying" portrait.
>
> -Brendan
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>> Ben does S
Paul,
That's an "electrifying" portrait.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> > Ben does Starbucks.
> >
>
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5812381&size=lg
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PD
46 matches
Mail list logo
