RE: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread Ed
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Pentax - [small] size matt ers? > Me, I didn't have a track pass and was reduced to taking > pictures of the girls in bikinis draped across the cars in > the paddock. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs

RE: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread Skofteland, Christian
> -Original Message- > From: dave o'brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > And almost all the *real* motorsports pros there had 600/f4.0 or > bigger lenses over one shoulder, so I guess small lightweight bodies > don't mean much in those circles. > > Me, I didn't have a track pass and was

Re: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread dave o'brien
A scroll of mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:04:09 -0400 Read it? y >Exactly. An F5 with a 600mm f4.0 isn't significantly bigger and heaver a >setup than an ME Super with a 600mm f4.0. Heck, even with an 80-200/2.8 >the difference is less significant and this is the kind of setup