Re: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread dave o'brien
A scroll of mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:04:09 -0400 Read it? y Exactly. An F5 with a 600mm f4.0 isn't significantly bigger and heaver a setup than an ME Super with a 600mm f4.0. Heck, even with an 80-200/2.8 the difference is less significant and this is the kind of setup

RE: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread Skofteland, Christian
-Original Message- From: dave o'brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] And almost all the *real* motorsports pros there had 600/f4.0 or bigger lenses over one shoulder, so I guess small lightweight bodies don't mean much in those circles. Me, I didn't have a track pass and was reduced

RE: Pentax - [small] size matt ers?

2001-09-14 Thread Ed
: Pentax - [small] size matt ers? snip Me, I didn't have a track pass and was reduced to taking pictures of the girls in bikinis draped across the cars in the paddock. snip - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow