[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 27 oktober 2001 17:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax AF viewfinders
Believe it or not, 100% viewfinders used to take a certain
amount of criticism too, years ago. Mainly from people that
used the full frame to compose their pictures and then found
Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax AF viewfinders
Erik wrote:
One of the things I've noticed with the modern AF cameras is
the overall
degeneration of the viewfinders compared to mechanical
cameras. The image
To me, I think the magnification of the current Pentax viewfinders are way
too low. This makes manual focus a punishment. Personally, I don't care of
they are 100% or not.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FREE download of MSN
Erik Nordin wrote:
One of the things I've noticed with the modern AF cameras is the overall
degeneration of the viewfinders compared to mechanical cameras. The image is
smaller, less bright, and they never cover the entire image area (neither
does the MX, but it shows more than the MZ
I agree that Nikon AF bodies have better viewfinders than Pentax AF bodies
in general. I believe the prime reason to make loosy viewfinders is to keep
the cost down, no matter what people say.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FREE
5 matches
Mail list logo
