Digital photography has made me a much better lover. Instant feeback
and all that ;-)
Not really. But I'd like to beleave it has improved my photographic skills.
MaritimTim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
I still shoot with fim in mind, meaning i don't machine gun and hope
for the best.
I think it has improved my "tough light" photos like back light and
sunsets/rises. I can see what works right away, instead of waiting for
the film and saying, "Oh crap"
Dave
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Steve
Interesting, thanks Jostein
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "AlunFoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> Steve,
>
> Digital
Steve,
Digital has not improved my skill. However it has improved my results.
>From 2000-2003 I took about 100 rolls of film each year. Then I went digital.
In 2004 I made about 3500 shots, so I didn't change my habits one bit
the first year.
2005 and 2006 saw a slight increase, probably towards 4
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too. If you can't
> beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off
> 87 snaps yesterday at a school event yesterday, she is in hog heaven. I
> guess the point I am trying
lol Boris
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> Hi!
>
> Steve, I just rec
Hi!
Steve, I just recently looked through my film photos, notably those that
I've taken with 6x6 folder camera. My initial reaction was that now I am
considerably weaker photographer than I was before. But then I reconsidered.
So, my answer is "yes and no".
;-).
Boris
Steve Larson wrote:
>
8 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> Steves question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
>
> No, but it's given me a new skill - chimping.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
> ---
Steves question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
No, but it's given me a new skill - chimping.
Regards,
Bob...
-
The original point and click interface was a Colt 45.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
>
>
>
>> - Original Mes
liam Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Larson&qu
co
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
A 35mm lens presents your traditional normal FoV.
Godfr
seems to me that with the instant feedback that digital provides
when you make changes, especially in lighting, and particularly
flash lighting, there is NO WAY using digital cannot improve your
photographic skills. You get way more feedback, just like HENDRIX.
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
; From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
>
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> Fr
Paul's looking for any excuse..huh, Cotty?
Jack
--- On Sat, 5/10/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> To: "pentax list"
> Date: Saturday, Ma
Addressing the question in the subject line first:
I had to think about that a bit, but then decided that yes, digital
photography has improved my skills, just not in a direction I would
have chosen.
Specifically, it has improved my ability to work with a point-and-shoot
camera, and more specific
oh man, I always wanted a 35/2. Guess I'll put it on the end of the wish
list.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital p
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> ah, thank you sir. After I sent that I was thinking LTD.
If you can find an FA 35/2, it is a very nice normal lens on Pentax DSLR. The
31 is a somewhat
better lens
gital photography improved your skills?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Larson"
> Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
>
>
>> indeed :)
>> btw, what size is a normal lens with these sensors?
>>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson"
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> indeed :)
> btw, what size is a normal lens with these sensors?
>
31mm LTD.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
On 10/5/08, Steve Larson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>indeed :)
>btw, what size is a normal lens with these sensors?
Over to bill...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Di
indeed :)
btw, what size is a normal lens with these sensors?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photog
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson"
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> Thanks you all, still seems you get what you put into it.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Thanks you all, still seems you get what you put into it.
Steve
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
lol, hiya Cotty
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> On 10/5/08, Steve Larson, discombobulated, unl
On 10/5/08, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Digital requires discipline.
Mark!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
On 10/5/08, Steve Larson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The wife blew off
..
>she is in hog heaven.
Goodness me I thought this was a family list ;)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Sat, 10 May 2008 05:17:42 -0700
Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
> guess the point I am trying to get across
> is if you have the ability to fire 20 shots at the same subject, are
> you going to take the same amount of set-up
> time for f/stop, exposure, background, composition, et
Steve,
For myself, I would say yes, digital has improved my skills - the
results I get are better!
I watched the pdml as digital became available, and the posted
pictures got better.
People were learning faster because of the instant feedback.
It convinced me to buy a *istDS and I've not looked ba
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson"
Subject: Question: Has digital photography improved your skills?
> Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too. If you can't
> beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off
> 87 snaps yesterday at a school event yesterday, she is in h
I'm taking many more pictures, but, generally, in a more casual manner. The
K10D's handling of a variety of lighting situations is continuously intriguing.
Experience with the technology has a positive effect on the end product, but,
obviously, may only be so as it relates to my eye.
Jack
--
Hi Steve,
I own a K20d for just about one month, but I feel that I wasted a lot of
time in the learning curve of photography while in film. The ability of
checking what you have done and if it was the picture you saw before you
took the shot, did improve my photo results in the way I always wanted
I do, (though some would say the results are still lousy), but what you
do is up to you.
Steve Larson wrote:
> Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too. If you can't
> beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off
> 87 snaps yesterday at a school event yesterday, she is in hog heav
> Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too.
> If you can't
> beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off
> 87 snaps yesterday at a school event yesterday, she is in hog
> heaven. I
> guess the point I am trying to get across
> is if you have the ability to fire 20 shots at the s
>From not form.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/5/10 David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, but my skills had grown rusty form not being used for so long
> before I got my *istD.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRI
Yes, but my skills had grown rusty form not being used for so long
before I got my *istD.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/5/10 Steve Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just curious that's all, I'll be getting a digital soon too. If you can't
> beat em, join em, lol. The wife blew off
> 87 snaps yesterday at a scho
Digital requires discipline. Just apply the same level of thought and
planning that you would when shooting film. Sometimes I pretend I'm
shooting with the 6x7 and have only ten exposures to work with. It's
all a matter of mindset. If you achieve that mental discipline,
digital will prove t
37 matches
Mail list logo
