Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

- Original Message - From: Brad Dobo Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 I'm really hoping Pentax does not pursue a DSLR. Then people will bitch and moan and threaten to switch and leave the list. It should make for some interesting emails. Actually, it would

Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

! :) - Original Message - From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:34 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 - Original Message - From: Brad Dobo Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 I'm really hoping

Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

- Original Message - From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:30 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 What about a digital LX which is every bit the same as the original LX, except with a Digital Back LX? You must wind

RE: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

Alan Chan wrote: What about a digital LX which is every bit the same as the original LX, except with a Digital Back LX? You must wind the film (of course there is no film, but Pentax keep the winding mechanism anyway for the purists) to take the next picture. What happened when the next

RE: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

-Original Message- From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I can certainly second that. The build quality of the MZ series cameras is very light and plasticky. Excepting the MZ-S of course. The funny thing is that the other MZ's (5n in particular) are such nice cameras...if

Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600

- Original Message - From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:52 AM Subject: RE: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 -Original Message- From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I can certainly second