> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Robb
>
> - Original Message -
> From: tom
> >
> > I used to think the same thing about my lab until I saw one of
> their display
> > prints start to turn a funky color.
>
> Define "funky
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 10:07 AM, tom wrote:
> I'm not sure how they process stuff, but I've gotten a bit uptight about
> processing since I saw that. I know they're very careful in general, and
> take pride in their work.
>
> I always use a 2 bath fix, selenium toning and air-drying.
Y
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Reynolds
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[5]: Delta 3200; was: Fast film recommendations?
>
>
> On Thursday, April
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Quoth Tom:
> > Don't most labs suck when it comes to b+w? It seem to me the world is
> > set up for color proofs.
>
> "Most"? I dunno. Maybe. Fortunately I've found at lea
Quoth Tom:
> Don't most labs suck when it comes to b+w? It seem to me the world is
> set up for color proofs.
"Most"? I dunno. Maybe. Fortunately I've found at least one
that seriously Fails To Suck at black and white. I guess I've
been lucky.
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 16:01:07 -0400, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 03:39 PM, tom wrote:
>>
>>This means the film didn't catch fire and no one died.
>
>Tom, I get the impression that your local lab really sucks. ;)
Don't most labs suck when it comes to b+w? It seem to me
On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 03:39 PM, tom wrote:
>
> This means the film didn't catch fire and no one died.
Tom, I get the impression that your local lab really sucks. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
7 matches
Mail list logo
