John Coyle wrote:
Which is exactly why, a couple of years ago, we had a thread on the utility of
DOF and I said then I thought it a waste of time on 35mm cameras. If you think
you can judge depth of field accurately when you're stopped way down, as one
usually is shooting macro, I believe,
John Coyle writes:
Which is exactly why, a couple of years ago, we had a thread on the utility of
DOF and I said then I thought it a waste of time on 35mm cameras. If you think
you can judge depth of field accurately when you're stopped way down, as one
usually is shooting macro, I
John Coyle wrote:
Which is exactly why, a couple of years ago, we had a thread on the utility
of
DOF and I said then I thought it a waste of time on 35mm cameras. If you
think
you can judge depth of field accurately when you're stopped way down, as
one
usually is shooting macro, I believe, sir,
Insect are some of my favorite subjects. So far 1x is all I've been doing
in the field. I am going to attempt some 2x when I get some issues worked
out. I'd be really interested in seeing the 7x aphid shot!
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: Patrick White
- Original Message -
From: Skofteland, Christian
Subject: RE: Real DOF
Insect are some of my favorite subjects. So far 1x is all
I've been doing
in the field. I am going to attempt some 2x when I get some
issues worked
out. I'd be really interested in seeing the 7x aphid shot
Thanks Bill. I'd seen this when I was going through past PUGs nice shot.
I love the goofy idea!
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Here is a close up of a computer screen..
http://pug.komkon.org/01feb/pixels.html
William
Which is exactly why, a couple of years ago, we had a thread on the utility of
DOF and I said then I thought it a waste of time on 35mm cameras. If you think
you can judge depth of field accurately when you're stopped way down, as one
usually is shooting macro, I believe, sir, you kid
: Real DOF the Pentax K1000
Which is exactly why, a couple of years ago, we had a thread on the utility
of
DOF and I said then I thought it a waste of time on 35mm cameras. If you
think
you can judge depth of field accurately when you're stopped way down, as one
usually is shooting macro, I
Erik Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, as one other member said some time ago, it's useful for evaluating the
amount of fuzziness in out-of-focus areas. The opposite of DOF, in other
words.
Right. I use the depth-of-field preview more as a quality-of-bokeh preview. I
know the background's
This thread demonstrates the principle of FLDSAC.
First Liar Doesn't Stand a Chance. Grin
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Real DOF the Pentax K1000
Erik Nordin
10 matches
Mail list logo
