On Tue, Feb 12, 2013, steve harley wrote:
>
> as you note, if he feels larger cameras have an undesirable social
> impact, there are plenty of options; i don't think a smartphone is
> the best alternative ? the situation in the Philippines has little
> relation to the ubiquity of smartphones, which
Bob,
Yes, I enjoyed watching that video, even though I am not sure
I agree with all the points "criticized" there.
Even before Instagram people were taking photos of their feet, weird
signs, self-portraits in the mirror, and what's not...
Experimenting and playing is fine, and that platform is g
on 2013-02-12 10:53 Igor Roshchin wrote
First, this guy is going to shoot 50 weddings in 1 day,
whatever that means...
But it cannot really mean a complete wedding coverage, does it?
Maybe just the 5-10-minute civil ceremony... or, conversely, just
a few shots of the couple and the family (analog
Igor,
Have you seen the Instagram video on U-tube?
They are all f-ing Michael Angelos creating a new
visual literacy in the great unwashed peoples of earth..
Iphones for everyone! Clean cups too!
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> I think I saw this infor
On 20/2/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>When you compose shots, do you think that your style is more about
>showing things, or hiding things?
Showing things - always.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Yeah, that's right. I knew I'd read that somewhere.
Jack
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
> Subject: Re: Show, or hide?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 10:19 AM
> I didn't initially say this
I wish I could express it that clearly.
I agree with Godfrey.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
This question reminds me of something someone famous said: "I spend so
much time looking at what I don't want in my photos to the degree that
I have to remind myself to look at what I do want."
It's not a matt
m: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: Show, or hide?
Ken do you, also, apply this philosophy to your photography?
Helpful hint: In order to do this, I've found it necessary to limit my
martini's.
Jack
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Ken Waller wrote:
From: Ken Waller
Subject: Re: Show, or h
Ken do you, also, apply this philosophy to your photography?
Helpful hint: In order to do this, I've found it necessary to limit my
martini's.
Jack
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
> Subject: Re: Show, or hide?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Ma
Mostly I try to show what I want to show and not show what I don't want to
show.
Mark !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: Show, or hide?
On 20/02/2011 7:44 PM, Larry Colen w
This question reminds me of something someone famous said: "I spend so
much time looking at what I don't want in my photos to the degree that
I have to remind myself to look at what I do want."
It's not a matter of "showing" or "hiding". It's a matter of
understanding what is in a particular scene
Mark said "Yes". I'd say "both" :-).
On 2/21/2011 3:44 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've been thinking about how I compose shots, and I've realized that
I often go to more effort to hide things that I think will detract
from the shot, than I do trying to make everything that I might want
is visible.
Larry Colen wrote:
>When you compose shots, do you think that your style is more about showing
>things, or hiding things?
Yes.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:51 PM, William Robb wrote:
> On 20/02/2011 7:44 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I've been thinking about how I compose shots, and I've realized that I often
>> go to more effort to hide things that I think will detract from the shot,
>> than I do trying to make everything that I
On 20/02/2011 7:44 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've been thinking about how I compose shots, and I've realized that I often go to more
effort to hide things that I think will detract from the shot, than I do trying to make
everything that I might want is visible. I'd often rather do two "detail"
p
Definitely about hiding things as I want to isolate & define the chosen
subject.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller+
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Show, or hide?
I've been thinking about how I compose shots, and I've realized that I
As I remarked the last time this topic came up, it rather depends on
whether you look "at" the viewfinder, or "through" it. I tend to
look through the viewfinder, so I often don't see things in the image
that would be distracting in the eventual presentation (the classic
"tree growing out of some
I don't really think about it a lot. I just try to find a picture that works
for me on a personal level. However, if there is something in frame that isn't
working for me, I'll try to find an angle that excludes it. If eliminating it
ruins the composition, I ask myself if I'll be able to clone i
I lean the other way. I get very "focussed" on my subject and have to
be careful about backgrounds.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I've been thinking about how I compose shots, and I've realized that I often
> go to more effort to hide things that I think will detract fro
LOL. Tru Dat.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Much hairier though.
>
>
>>
>> Mine is cuter, and not as fat!
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7248613
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:56 AM, John Sessoms
>> wrote:
>> > From: P N Stenquist
>> >>
>> >> On May 6,
Much hairier though.
>
> Mine is cuter, and not as fat!
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7248613
>
> Dan
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:56 AM, John Sessoms
> wrote:
> > From: P N Stenquist
> >>
> >> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
> >>
> >>> > Show us yer bum :-) >
> >
,_!_,
Den 6. mai 2010 kl. 17.31 skrev Cotty:
> Show us yer bum :-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> -- http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.ne
Mine is cuter, and not as fat!
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7248613
Dan
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:56 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: P N Stenquist
>>
>> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
>>
>>> > Show us yer bum :-) >
>>
>> I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it o
From: P N Stenquist
On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
> Show us yer bum :-)
>
I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
> --
Are You A Turtle?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listi
LoL..out loud!
J
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, Tom C wrote:
> From: Tom C
> Subject: Re: SHOW
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 12:30 PM
> Thanks Jackass. ;-)
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jack Davis
> wrote:
> > I remembe
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The best bums are Irish ...
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4030/4584828924_78cea05394_o.jpg
come on, Eileen, too rye ayyy...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Thanks Jackass. ;-)
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I remember when you originally "mooned" this shot. Perched at an odd angle,
> butt still, really nice!
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Thu, 5/6/10, Tom C wrote:
>
>> From: Tom C
>> Subject
LOL.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
> I'd like his field and his maidservant too. And his iPod - I didn't see that
> mentioned in Exodus.
>
>>
>> neither shalt thou covet thy neighbour's house, his field, or
>> his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or
>> any thing
I remember when you originally "mooned" this shot. Perched at an odd angle,
butt still, really nice!
Jack
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, Tom C wrote:
> From: Tom C
> Subject: Re: SHOW
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 10:15 AM
>
I'd like his field and his maidservant too. And his iPod - I didn't see that
mentioned in Exodus.
>
> neither shalt thou covet thy neighbour's house, his field, or
> his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or
> any thing that is thy neighbour's.
>
> Funny Bob!
>
> On Thu, May
neither shalt thou covet thy neighbour's house, his field, or his
manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that
is thy neighbour's.
Funny Bob!
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote:
> I covet Tom's ass.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
The best bums are Irish ...
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4030/4584828924_78cea05394_o.jpg
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a
I covet Tom's ass.
>
> My ass is bigger, but I found it on google images. Tom's ass
> is actually his own.
> Paul
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:15:47PM -0400, Tom C wrote:
> >> OK everybody, who has a bigger ass?
> >>
> >> Paul's
paul stenquist wrote:
>On May 6, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
>> P N Stenquist wrote:
>>> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
Show us yer bum :-)
>>> I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
>>
>> how t
My ass is bigger, but I found it on google images. Tom's ass is actually his
own.
Paul
On May 6, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:15:47PM -0400, Tom C wrote:
>> OK everybody, who has a bigger ass?
>>
>> Paul's ass:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?
On May 6, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> P N Stenquist wrote:
>> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
>>> Show us yer bum :-)
>>>
>> I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
>
> how to keep people from clicking on a
I left myself a pretty big target on that one. :-)
Tom C.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:15:47PM -0400, Tom C wrote:
>> OK everybody, who has a bigger ass?
>>
>> Paul's ass:
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
>>
>> Tom
ROTFLMAO!
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> P N Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
>>
>>> Show us yer bum :-)
>>>
>> I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
>
> how to keep people f
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:15:47PM -0400, Tom C wrote:
> OK everybody, who has a bigger ass?
>
> Paul's ass:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
>
> Tom's ass:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4147790
>
> Tom C.
Tom IS the bigger ass, not sure who HAS the biggest a
OK everybody, who has a bigger ass?
Paul's ass:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
Tom's ass:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4147790
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas
P N Stenquist wrote:
On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
Show us yer bum :-)
I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
how to keep people from clicking on a link, example 1.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Shucks..what a let down. [=(
anonymous (snicker)
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, P N Stenquist wrote:
> From: P N Stenquist
> Subject: Re: SHOW
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 9:51 AM
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
>
> &
On May 6, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
Show us yer bum :-)
I have a nice looking ass, and I enjoy showing it off:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10982480
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Jack, you bum!
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> OKAY!!
>
> Tom
>
> --- On Thu, 5/6/10, Cotty wrote:
>
>> From: Cotty
>> Subject: SHOW
>> To: "pentax list"
>> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 8:31 AM
>> Show us yer bum :-)
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Cotty
>>
>>
>> ___/\__
>>
Cotty wrote:
Show us yer bum :-)
BUY MY PICTURE!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 6/5/10, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>OKAY!!
Oh crickey maybe I shouldn'ta said that.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
h
OKAY!!
Tom
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, Cotty wrote:
> From: Cotty
> Subject: SHOW
> To: "pentax list"
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 8:31 AM
> Show us yer bum :-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) |
> People, Places, Pastiche
> -- http://www.cottysnaps.com
Oh Geez... !
Tom C.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
> Show us yer bum :-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
> -- http://www.cottysnaps.com
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
Congratulations!
Any chance of you sharing with us some kind of link? I mean those who
are too far away to come look at them personally ;-).
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are
If your definition of friends is something in the line of people who put up
with you. Then yes.
Congrats. A bit short notice for me to show up, but it sure would have been
fun.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Woohoo!
On 3/19/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
> right?).
>
> My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1, at La
> Carrera bike sh
Great news Knarf!
Of course you'll post your show entries.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Show
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends
Congratulations, Frank. Now you have two weeks to get everything you
want to show ready... ! ;-)
no pressure.
Godfrey
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:52 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are
frank theriault wrote:
>Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
>yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
>right?).
>
>My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1, at La
>Carrera bike shop here in Toronto.
>
>I still don't know wha
Good to hear Frank
I dont have a calader handy, but iof its a Sat/Sunday, i should be
able to run down
Dave
On 3/19/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
Congratulations are in order! And yes, we are your friends.
--
Bruce
Monday, March 19, 2007, 1:52:12 PM, you wrote:
ft> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
ft> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
ft> right?).
ft> My first show in o
frank theriault wrote:
>My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1, at La
>Carrera bike shop here in Toronto.
Good job, Frank! I'll try to make it up there for a visit when the
show's up.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml
Congratulations Frank. Good to see you back on the list.
Paul
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:52 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
> right?).
>
> My first show in over a year and
Congratulations Frank.
frank theriault wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
> right?).
>
> My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1, at La
> Carrera bike shop here in Toront
Wait a minute, does he have beer?
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Congratulations are in order! And yes, we are your friends.
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
frank theriault wrote:
> Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
> yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
> right?).
>
> My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1, at La
> Carrera bike shop here in Toronto.
>
> I still don't k
In a message dated 3/19/2007 2:14:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Haven't been too active of late, but I got some exciting news
yesterday that I should share with friends (you guys ~are~ friends,
right?).
My first show in over a year and a half is opening April 1,
On 19/3/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>No big whoop, but I'm looking forward to it!
Go Frank. Good luck mate. Looking forward to seeing you in June.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
worn?
IMO, it would hardly seem to be an issue if you're going to a printed output
anyway.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Takeshita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:44 AM
S
I doubt that Pentax has regressed.
BTW, I think Doug was being facetious. It's probably not time to get
nostalgic about the *istD.
On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 18/10/06, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, that's it. The camera is useless.
>
> Tha
Current on both the Digital Modul R and the M8.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Moiré (was: Re: Show in Japan)
> On 18
On 18/10/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob,
>
> So, what do you think of Leica's missing anti-alias filter, replaced by
> anti-moire processing?
I don't. Is is current or proposed?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Hi Joe,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:31:02 -0700, Joseph Tainter wrote:
>http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
>
>This is the sample 2 shown in the K10D site
>
>-
>
>When I look at this image at a scale that fills the browser window, or
>fills the screen in PS, I see moire a
Rob,
So, what do you think of Leica's missing anti-alias filter, replaced by
anti-moire processing?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:03 AM
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> [Moire a/k/a aliasing discussion]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing_filter
Been there, done that. They help, but you always end up with /some/
pathological case. Now, if you can engineer the pathological cases to
be outside the problem domain, you're s
On 18/10/06, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, that's it. The camera is useless.
That was one great thing about the *ist D, the AA filter seemed very
well matched to the sensor which meant that images sharpened well and
rarely suffered aliasing problems, though it didn't measure up a
On 18/10/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see it, for sure. But in this case, anyway, it's only going to show
> up to "pixel peeping". I bet if it shows up on a print, it'll be
> unnoticeable.
Some of the printing firms that I used to service were big into
printing high quality
On 10/17/06 8:49 PM, "Doug Franklin", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see it, for sure. But in this case, anyway, it's only going to show
> up to "pixel peeping". I bet if it shows up on a print, it'll be
> unnoticeable.
As you said, they (folks in Japan) were saying that this was a result of
se
On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Ken Takeshita wrote:
>
> Actually, I just accidentally found the thread in Japan wherein folks
> are talking about the moire, taking an examplke of Pnteax's recent
> sample.
>
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
>
> This is the sample 2 shown
On 18/10/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's near impossible to prevent, too, if you're using a sensor with the
> pixels in a regular arrangement. The only reason film usually avoids
> gross moire patterns is that its "pixel array" is semi-random. If your
> sensor array is a regu
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter"
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
>
> This is the sample 2 shown in the K10D site
>
> -
>
> When I look at this image at a scale that fills the browser window, or
> fills the screen in PS, I see moire all over
Yes. If it only appears at one enlargement it's a result of monitor
scan lines and pixels lining up in an unfortunate way.
Paul
On Oct 17, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
>
> This is the sample 2 shown in the K10D site
>
> --
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> So I assume it is just an effect of the monitor.
>
> Yes? No?
The regular "grid" of the pixels on a monitor can also exhibit moire in
its interactions with the "grid" in the digital image. Basically, you
can get moire at almost any interaction like image-sensor,
image-di
Ken Takeshita wrote:
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
>
> This is the sample 2 shown in the K10D site.
> If you look really close at the area of her right shoulder between her
> arm and hair, you might be able to see some colour moire. It is hard
> to see but it's t
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> The problem is near impossible
> to remedy in post processing as it's an optical effect therefore can't
> be readily distinguished from wanted information.
It's near impossible to prevent, too, if you're using a sensor with the
pixels in a regular arrangement. The o
Adam Maas wrote:
> Moire is the odd patterns you sometimes see in fine (high frequency)
> detail in digital shots or scans.
Or when you look through two screens at the same time, and they're at
slight angles to each other.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/k10d/image/ex_02.jpg
This is the sample 2 shown in the K10D site
-
When I look at this image at a scale that fills the browser window, or
fills the screen in PS, I see moire all over the area of the blouse
outside of the "bib" (whatever it's called).
On 18/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aha...yes I see some colour lines there, but you really have to be looking
> right up
> close to spot it. I can't see that bothering me.
It may be quite annoying to me, I shoot do shoot fabrics under
controlled lighting,. It's an indica
Aha...yes I see some colour lines there, but you really have to be looking
right up
close to spot it. I can't see that bothering me.
James
Quoting Ken Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/17/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Moire is the odd patterns you sometimes see in fine (hi
On 10/17/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moire is the odd patterns you sometimes see in fine (high frequency)
> detail in digital shots or scans.
>
> -Adam
Actually, I just accidentally found the thread in Japan wherein folks
are talking about the moire, taking an examplke of Pnteax's r
Moire is the odd patterns you sometimes see in fine (high frequency)
detail in digital shots or scans.
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hell, I don't even know what moire is!
>
> Quoting Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> From one of Ken's reports:
>>
>> "Pentax explanation on the floo
Hell, I don't even know what moire is!
Quoting Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From one of Ken's reports:
>
> "Pentax explanation on the floor said they were not forcing the
> removal
> of the nosie, colour noise or colour moire. Instead, they are going
> by the extremely finer gradation
What Pentax were saying, as I interpreted, was the images (jpeg?) were
so good right out of the camera without any setting of noise removal and
others (such as natural/bright or whatever else the camera has).
We'll see how people report this weekend from Tokyo.
Ken
-
Thanks, Ken. I hope p
On 10/17/06 5:19 PM, "Joseph Tainter", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been thinking this over the past couple of days. Moire? I haven't
> seen moire raised previously as an issue in the K10D. Pentax seems to be
> saying: "Noise? Moire? Remove them yourselves." For the noise, that is
> probabl
On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> From one of Ken's reports:
>
> But how does one remove moire?
I think there is a tutorial, maybe even a script to remove moire
patterns on Russell Brown's site. A Google search should bring up more
references.
> And why should it be an is
From one of Ken's reports:
"Pentax explanation on the floor said they were not forcing the removal
of the nosie, colour noise or colour moire. Instead, they are going
by the extremely finer gradation to render very natural images. They
further said that if anyone would be bothered by the colour
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> And the high ISO images showed in Japan yesterday were taken with
> firmware version 0.20. Pentax is getting a lot of mileage out of that
> version.
But don't forget the different hardware version prototypes. I read
somewhere that Pentax were testing
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Paul, I believe they are full-size jpegs. At least they felt that way
> when I downloaded them on my dial-up connection.
>
> And the high ISO images showed in Japan yesterday were taken with
> firmware version 0.20. Pentax is getting a lot of mileage out of that
> versi
On 16.10.06, at 21:03 , Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Are these stipulations in the delivery contracts new? Here in the
> U.S.,
> we have been accustomed to getting new Pentax equipment nearly last in
> the world.
I would gladly wait one or two months longer for a new equipment just
to get US prices
No, trade with Vietnam has been normalized for some time, at least 15 years.
Joseph Tainter wrote:
>Are Pentax lenses still assembled in Vietnam? I am pretty sure they are
>(I am getting a bit out of touch on these things :-). Because of some
>sort of trade embargo from Vietnam to the U.S. (a
Joseph Tainter wrote:
>Downloading the full-size originals, then looking at them at Actual
>Pixels...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
If you wanna judje with a GX10 v020 then use my picture, at leastn it
is available in RAW. That JPEGs is awfully compressed :(
2006/10/16, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Firmware was said to be 0.2Folks did not see any appreciable noise
> in the sample prints. Considering these were b
On 10/16/06 3:52 PM, "Christian", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "ISO 1600 images can be found here, presumably taken with Firmware 0.20:"
Now I understood what my confusion was. All along, I was talking about two
samples shown in the Show in Japan in ISO 1000 and 1600 respectively, taken
by a pro
On 10/16/06 3:44 PM, "Joseph Tainter", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But
> there is no problem with direct economic ties between Vietnam and the U.S.
>
> A couple of years ago someone reported here that all production from the
> Hanoi plant goes to Manila, from where it is shipped to fill orders.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The web images you're looking at are too low-res to provide any real
> information
in regard to noise levels. I'm surprised that you're wringing your hands
over
low-res web images produced with 0.2 firmware.
"ISO 1600 images can be found here, presumably taken with Fi
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
