ooops, I just realised that I lied in my previous post! I did a litle more
manipulation to some of the shots than I said - ie. cloned out the dust
spots from my grubby sensor, and also vignetted a couple of them. Oh, and
also, the shots of the fence have been manipulated further again - I had to
c
ography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography
>
>
> ooops, I just realised that I lied in my previous post! I did a litle more
> manipulation to some of the shots than
7;s what "stock" photography is all about. Bit like a lottery really...
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography
The shot with the
Tanja,
Looks like you're branching out a bit. What took you in this
direction? Inquiring minds want to know!
Comments:
For me, the door shots suffer from shooting from too low of an angle.
They are leaning over just a bit too much. Other than that, they are
very nice. Seems that someone looki
Oh, Tan, the hand on the fence is very, very good.
On your rose pics, I would clone out the blemishes. My eye went right to
them.
I think you'll do better with a real macro lens and sharpening. Here's
what can be done with the *ist D, FA 100 macro, and nik Sharpener Pro.
http://pug.komkon.org/0
> -Original Message-
> From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography
>
>
>
> Thanks Don! That is my grubby little hand you see t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And this one is my undisputed favourite from the day, and has no
manipulation at all, this is straight from the camera:
http://www.tanyamayer.com/stock22july04/22.htm
tan.
Its gorgeous. How did you take this one? It looks surreal. No
manipulation? Details, details
--- Tanya Mayer Photography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: >
> Frank, blowing wind up Tan's arse said:
>
This is an obviously Aussie expression that I'm not
sure I'm so comfortable with.
-frank
ps: I was going to follow up that first line with a
joke about your you-know-what (the thing I'm alleg
On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
>
>Frank, blowing wind up Tan's arse said:
>
>"Dammit, woman, you piss me off.
>
>You're just so damned good!!
>
>Great stuff, tan."
>
>
>Erm, yeah, like you're such a crap photographer yourself! You SO have
>nothing to be pissed about
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography
--- Tanya Mayer Photography <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: >
> Frank, blowing wind up Tan's arse said:
>
This is an obviously Aussie express
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tan's foray into stock photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>And this one is my undisputed favourite from the day, and has no
>manipulation at all, this is straight from the
Oh. I could swear it was a Holga.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Here's what I did - *istD exposure settings at ISO400, 1/30th, f3.5,
contrast - high, saturation - high, sharpness - high.
I used the AF-500ftz, set manually, at 1/16th, and with Lumiquest Promax
Softbox attached.
Lens was Tokina atx
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Then, as I shot, I moved the camera in a slight circlular movement to blur
the bokeh even further and to give the feel of movement.
That's given me a fantastic idea: a tripod mount that rotates about a
point in front of the lens, the distance of which from the lens i
Really nice work. I agree with your favorite, even before I read it was
your favorite.
14 matches
Mail list logo
