-an-hour and there would have been several dozen iterations of the call!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of D.
Glenn Arthur
Jr.
Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:19 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Th
From: Tom C
From: dgl...@panix.com (D. Glenn Arthur Jr.)
OTOH, I've been to museums where they claimed that their reason for
prohibiting photography was that even _available_light_ photography
somehow damaged pigments! Hmph!
-- Glenn
Yes, and if you t
gt;
> > From: Mark Roberts To: Pentax-Discuss
> > Mail List Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
> >
> > Bruce Walker wrote:
> >
> >> Comes down to money from tickets and gift shops.
rk materials.
Jack Davis
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
From: Mark Roberts To: Pentax-Discuss
Mail List Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
Bruce Walker wro
: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
That was soul... not soil. I need new glasses. :)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tom C wrote:
>> From: dgl...@panix.com (D. Glenn Arthur Jr.)
>>
>> OTOH, I've been to museums where they claimed that their re
That was soul... not soil. I need new glasses. :)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tom C wrote:
>> From: dgl...@panix.com (D. Glenn Arthur Jr.)
>>
>> OTOH, I've been to museums where they claimed that their reason for
>> prohibiting photography was that even _available_light_ photography
>> some
7:30
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
>
> Was advised by a Hearst's Castle tour guide that flash was banned due
> to it's continuous used actually leaching color from tapestries and
> certain other
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Tom C
> >
> > OTOH, I've been to museums where they claimed that their reason for
> > prohibiting photography was that even _available_light_ photography
> > somehow damaged pigments! Hmph!
> >
> >
> From: dgl...@panix.com (D. Glenn Arthur Jr.)
>
> OTOH, I've been to museums where they claimed that their reason for
> prohibiting photography was that even _available_light_ photography
> somehow damaged pigments! Hmph!
>
> -- Glenn
Yes, and if you take
That is a bizarre theory indeed.
In the Kremlin Museum and in the Hermitage we were told photography
was forbidden. Once inside, however, I discovered one could purchase
a photography permit for $10. It was a small badge that I had to wear
on my shirt. They asked however that I not use the flas
I've been to at least one museum where they were pretty upfront about
the copyright motive: photography was permitted but you had to promise
not to publish the photos you took (and not block anybody else's path
with your tripod). I don't recall whether flash was permitted or not.
In the Smithson
s.com/
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin
To: PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
When I was in the 8th grade, I heard an example about a museum guard
who was telling the visitors that a ce
When I was in the 8th grade, I heard an example about a museum guard
who was telling the visitors that a certain item was 4008 years old.
Somebody asked him about how he knew it so exactly. His answer was:
"I started working here 8 years ago, and then they told me that that
item was 4 thousand y
davis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
From: Mark Roberts
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
Bruce Walker wrote:
>Comes down to money from tickets and gift shops. And a bit of
>superstition.
Bruce Walker wrote:
>Comes down to money from tickets and gift shops. And a bit of
>superstition. UV is just not a practical concern.
>
>Most revealing ... http://goo.gl/vdxl8
I always assumed flash was banned because it's f*cking inconsiderate
to other people trying to view the art.
--
Mark
15 matches
Mail list logo
