A great rectilinear 35mm F4 for the P67.
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>>> Agreed. I would prefer that ~all~ AF lenses have an AF/MF
>>> clutch,
>> The FA43/1.9 Limited too?
> No, no, Alan. Leave it there . I like the mf feeling of Limited
> lenses. It is the best of what Pentax has made about mf feel in
> land of AF lenses. Besides, I don't find AF/MF clutch of
A good 35 and a 100 macro are hard to beat! :-)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Depends what I'm shooting :) I enjoy walking around the botanical gardens
>with a Z-1p and FA100/2.8 macro lens. I haven't done that for a while though.
>
> For more scenic stuff, a K2 or LX with either the old 3
Wendy wrote:
>And there's one for sale for just 99 GBP, as I recall, at that UK shop that
>someone cited yesterday. Starts with a W.
If it's the same shop starting with a W that I just looked at then they've
just upped the price to 299. (or you looked on the wrong line)
That would be the second
At 07:48 23-1-2002 -0500, you wrote:
>From: "Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: What lens do you wish Pentax made?
>
>Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There was a prototype 32~39/2.8. That would have been very nice.
> >
An FA50-200 2.8, focusing down to three feet. That lens would spend a lot of
time on my MZ-S. And couldn't they make the 24-90 a constant f4? I really
don't like variable aperture zooms.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net a
A wise man wrote wrote: "I want an autofocus 80-200 zoom lens that has the
optical quality of the FA* 80-200 F2.8 zoom, but with a maximum aperture of
F3.5 or F4."
If it might rival the excellent Canon 70-200/4 L (or, well, if it will at
least come in K mount. . . ) I'll buy one.
In the hope
an Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:01 AM
>Subject: Re: What lens do you wish Pentax made?
>
>
> > >My lens would be a 35/1.2, dunno if it`s possible or not, I`d settle for
>a
> > >35/1.4. It would b
> Olympus's 100/2 macro was justly popular.
Actually, the longer Zuiko Macro was a 90mm f/2. The 100/2 wasn't designated
a macro lens. But it almost was: it focussed very close for a 100mm, well
under two feet if I remember correctly. It was an absolutely marvelous lens.
Well, still is, as you ca
But the toy must double as a film puller :-)
--- Ed Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And a special plaque that comes with it, suitable
> for hanging on my
> wall. Oh, and a free toy (like a happy meal has).
>
> Thanks,
> Ed
> http://lightandsilver.com
> > >
> > He wants a 101mm limited Pr
> Mark started a poll with
> I want an autofocus 80-200 zoom lens that has the optical quality of
> the FA* 80-200 F2.8 zoom, but with a maximum aperture of F3.5 or F4.
> This lens would be a perfect companion for the MZ-S and 24-90 zoom
> lens.
Hi,
I definitely second that. My wish is a FA* 70
, January 22, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What lens do you wish Pentax made?
>
>
> He wants a 101mm limited Prime in titanium with one of
> those green leather soft cases and non removable
> hoods.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
I should have added: "with AF".
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
He wants a 101mm limited Prime in titanium with one of
those green leather soft cases and non removable
hoods.
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you not consider the K105/2.8, or the SMC Tak
> version, a quality
> portrait lens?
>
> Ed Mathews wrote:
> >
> > A quality portra
Would you not consider the K105/2.8, or the SMC Tak version, a quality
portrait lens?
Ed Mathews wrote:
>
> A quality portrait lens around 105mm, Maybe F2 or F2.8.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
Yes, I know about the A*200/2.8 - in fact I have one - but I'd still
like something between 150mm and 200mm. Also, a 250mm/2.8 or so would be
nice. The FA*24/2.0 is huge, and it's auto focus. Not my cup o' tea.
Mark Erickson wrote:
>
> Shel,
>
> Pentax (almost) makes (or made) a couple of the
100mm (or there abouts) f/1.4 designed essentially the same as the 77 limited. Must
come
with tailored hood.
Regards,
Bob...
"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
T
Shel,
Pentax (almost) makes (or made) a couple of the lenses on your wish list.
There's a Pentax A* 200mm F2.8 on eBay right now, and the FA* 24mm F2.0 is a
pretty nice lens. Oh, I forgot one other lens I'd like to see: bring back
a 135mm F1.8! A fast lens like this would be superb for ava
A quality portrait lens around 105mm, Maybe F2 or F2.8.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
19 matches
Mail list logo
