home office from anywhere in the world, no matter how
remote.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: digital for $
>
Hi,
> It's definitely a money issue. No more chemicals, no more processor
> maintenance, no more film expenses. And in newspaper photography,
> where we used a 180 dpi resolution for photos but could go to 150 dpi
> without any noticeable difference, quality was never the top
> consideration.
I worked for The Ithaca Journal, a small (20,000 circulation) daily,
for five years up through 2001. The photo department went fully
digital after I left, but I agree with the money vs. speed argument.
While the additional speed available on deadline is nice, the vast
majority of photos for the
Hi,
I was going to post that link under the subject 'Something to argue
about'. Anyway, here's another link that's relevant:
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue9807/editorial.htm
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:40:32 PM, you wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>If editor's still demand lots of shots to chose from, as most do, the whole
>argument is moot. Besides those slide photographers throw out more slides
>than they keep. Then there is the question of accessablity, do photos stored
>in a box in my attic add anything to the re
If editor's still demand lots of shots to chose from, as most do, the whole
argument is moot. Besides those slide photographers throw out more slides
than they keep. Then there is the question of accessablity, do photos stored
in a box in my attic add anything to the record of history?
The whole
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 06:51:04 -0700 (PDT), petit miam wrote:
>What depth of field? Where? Why do you want DOF in
>macro shots anyway? I like my subject to stand out
>from the out-of-focus background.
>You certainly haven't convinced me. I'm going to stick
>with my analogue cameras for a very long
What depth of field? Where? Why do you want DOF in
macro shots anyway? I like my subject to stand out
from the out-of-focus background.
You certainly haven't convinced me. I'm going to stick
with my analogue cameras for a very long time.
Jody.
> I'm not much of a fan of the current digital came
8 matches
Mail list logo
