-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: first post XP-2 and PAW
The nicest thing about this is exemplified in just this
situation: a couple of people like something, others don't,
but what
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: first post XP-2 and PAW
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:22:36 -0800
The nicest thing about this is exemplified in just this
situation: a couple of people like something, others don't,
but what the dialogue does, at least for me, is to allow one
to take another look at a photograph
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: first post XP-2 and PAW
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:24:15 -0700
Exactly. When I first commented on the photo I wanted to see more detail
in
the highlights. I haven't totally changed my mind, but I do see how the
highlights give it a somewhat haunting image, which works
On 10 Mar 2004 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
...of course, I'd ~never~ say that I like blown out highlights in someone
else's photo, just because I've taken so many photos with the highlights
inadvertantly blown out by overexposure, after which I've pawned off the
print as artsty.
Rob,
That is so freaking wild!
I like that a lot.
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw a documentary on a young Sydney photographer Trent Parke a week
Me Too!
frank theriault wrote:
Rob,
That is so freaking wild!
I like that a lot.
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw a documentary
Frank ... too static ... this artsy fartsy phase of yours is
gonna get you a lot of commissions for OOF work and photos
with no highlight detail. You're on your way the the Big
Time!
frank theriault wrote:
I've taken so many photos with the highlights
inadvertantly blown out by overexposure,
Well, Frank, I have to admit there's a lot of truth in what
you say LOL
frank theriault wrote:
...and in the process, Shel learned I'm still right, and frank's dead
wrong!
LOL!
The nicest thing about this is exemplified in just this
situation: a couple of people like something, others
Hi,
Glad you could join in the PAW.
I took a quick look at your photo and was concerned about
the lack of detail in the highlights, the area outside. It
detracts from the photo, imo. I like what you're doing
though, and would love to see more pics of the old mill.
Documenting these places is,
The contrast might have been a just little lower, allowing the exterior to
have a little more detail, but I like the shot.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Clint Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:03
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: first post XP-2 and PAW
Shel,
Funny, but, as you can see from my previous post, it's those blown out
highlights from outside that I like! Adds to a ghostly feel appropriate to
an abandoned factory, IMHO.
Go
The nicest thing about this is exemplified in just this
situation: a couple of people like something, others don't,
but what the dialogue does, at least for me, is to allow one
to take another look at a photograph through, as it were,
another's eyes, perhaps seeing something that was
overlooked,
12 matches
Mail list logo
