1600 can look pretty good, just don't underexpose.
Trying to bring deep shadows up very far looks quite ugly!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:35 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: istDS @ 1600 ISO
Just
On 26 Oct 2005 at 16:34, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the original PEF file for the Pile
of Leaves pic that was recently posted, I noticed that it was shot @ 1600
ISO. I'm quite surprised (and pleased) at how little noise there is, and
noise reduction was
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the original PEF file for the Pile
of Leaves pic that was recently posted, I noticed that it was shot @ 1600
ISO. I'm quite surprised (and pleased) at how little noise there is, and
noise reduction was turned off in the camera.
I wouldn't have guessed looking at your nicely rendered image, but I'm
not surprised. I've found that with a good exposure and no cropping,
ISO 1600 pics can be quite nice. Noise reduction only kicks in on long
exposures. I find that the images are cleaner than those one might get
from ISO
I've found ISO 1600 can do remarkably well too, although I usually
try to keep ISO down to 800 if I want very large enlargements. That
is, unless I'm going for a grainy/gritty texture.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a quick comment. While looking at the
5 matches
Mail list logo
