al
De: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Enviado: jueves, 12 de julio, 2007 19:07:58
Asunto: Re: Raw file format?
Maybe consider giving Picasa a try.
It's simple to use & free.
Cheers,
Dave
On 7/12/07, Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
From:
Alan Abbott
> Hi All,
> I tried a program to convert PEF's to jpegs (I wanted something small
> that would just do a quick batch convert for when I am away).
> I have a *STDs. The program did not see the files. so I uninstalled it
> and filled in the feedback. This is the reply I got from t
Wow, never heard about that.
(Or maybe when the cameras were in production, I wasn't much interested in the
subject).
Thanks Jan.
- Mensaje original
De: Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Enviado: jueves, 12 de julio, 2007 18:34:55
Asunto: R
Maybe consider giving Picasa a try.
It's simple to use & free.
Cheers,
Dave
On 7/12/07, Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be great! thanks.
> Alan
>
>
> Paul Sorenson wrote:
> > Alan -
> >
> > The old RawShooter essentials will do batch conversions from PEF to JPG
> > as well
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:42:11 -0700 (PDT), Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
>I don't think that the Optio S and S4 can produce RAW files at all.
Yes, they can, but it is undocumented.
You need to go into the service menu when switching it on,
using some key combination, similar to the K10D one :-)
You can
>> It seems that there is some kind of differences between PEFs among Pentax
>>>> DSLRs since some programs needed to be updated in order to support the
>>>> K10D PEFs.
>>>>
>>>> - Mensaje original
>>>> De: Alan Abbott <[EMAI
e updated in order to support the K10D
>>> PEFs.
>>>
>>> - Mensaje original
>>> De: Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Para: pdml@pdml.net
>>> Enviado: jueves, 12 de julio, 2007 12:58:11
>>> Asunto: Raw file format?
>&g
is some kind of differences between PEFs among Pentax
>> DSLRs since some programs needed to be updated in order to support the K10D
>> PEFs.
>>
>> - Mensaje original
>> De: Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Para: pdml@pdml.net
>> Enviado: jueve
pport the K10D
> PEFs.
>
> - Mensaje original
> De: Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: pdml@pdml.net
> Enviado: jueves, 12 de julio, 2007 12:58:11
> Asunto: Raw file format?
>
> Hi All,
> I tried a program to convert PEF's to jpegs (I wanted something small
D]>
Para: pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: jueves, 12 de julio, 2007 12:58:11
Asunto: Raw file format?
Hi All,
I tried a program to convert PEF's to jpegs (I wanted something small
that would just do a quick batch convert for when I am away).
I have a *STDs. The program did not see the files. so I uni
I have a program like that on my PC, but i have not tried it with K10D PEF's
I will and get back
Dave
On 7/12/07, Alan Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried a program to convert PEF's to jpegs (I wanted something small
> that would just do a quick batch convert for when I am awa
Hi All,
I tried a program to convert PEF's to jpegs (I wanted something small
that would just do a quick batch convert for when I am away).
I have a *STDs. The program did not see the files. so I uninstalled it
and filled in the feedback. This is the reply I got from them. I am
confused, I was
12bits per pixels give you a bit depth of 36bits (12 x 3 colors), but since
modern computers are module-8 (bits/byte) they pad it up to 48bits (16bpp).
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
If I remember correctly from the StarkistD's specs the raw file format can
be saved in the 12 bit mode. I'm familiar with 8 and 16, but not 12. I
know 8 gives you 24ppg and 16 gives you 48ppg with some functions in
photoshop disabled. Anyone that can enlighten me as to what you wind u
>
> My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16 bit. This makes
> the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over 12MB, where they
> should only need to be 9MB or so.
By my reading of it, the TIFF spec doesn't allow two 12-bit quantities
to be packed into three bytes. So it
On 26 Sep 2003 at 0:12, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible that Pentax uses 16 bit because of the
> new multi exposure feature?
> To sum up the 12 bit data without loosing Information,
> you need more then 12 bits.
> If yes, it could be possible to reduce noise
> with multi exposu
Hello,
is it possible that Pentax uses 16 bit because of the
new multi exposure feature?
To sum up the 12 bit data without loosing Information,
you need more then 12 bits.
If yes, it could be possible to reduce noise
with multi exposures on static subjects,
this is the same process which is used w
Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>they're 6 megs. When converted to 8 bit tiff, they're 18 megs.
>>
>>I thought a raw file was a sensor dump, and the size of the file
>>should correlate with the size of the sensor?
>
>It should: 12 bits (1.5 bytes) per pi
"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> "Peter Loveday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16
>> bit. This makes
>> >the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Peter Loveday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16
> bit. This makes
> >the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over
> 12MB, where they
> >should only
"Peter Loveday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My only complaint is that the 12 bit data is padded to 16 bit. This makes
>the raw file bigger than it needs to be; they are over 12MB, where they
>should only need to be 9MB or so. This reduces storage on CF, and slows
>write times, seemingly unnecesa
> er but did it take a nice shot?
But of course - yet another wonderful photo of the inside of a camera store.
It's amazing how many of those seem to accumulate over the years. :)
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
On 24/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Had a play with a *istD in a local camera store today. I'd have to say I
>was impressed.
>
>I took along my CF card to grab some shots, and took a few RAW files to have
>a peek at. For anyone who is interested in technical details, these are in
>fact TIF
Had a play with a *istD in a local camera store today. I'd have to say I
was impressed.
I took along my CF card to grab some shots, and took a few RAW files to have
a peek at. For anyone who is interested in technical details, these are in
fact TIFF files with a .PEF extension.
Most TIFF loadin
24 matches
Mail list logo
