hi
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
> > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> > Cotty
> >
> > The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
> > use it for jamming in an end flap of the film box to remind me what's
> > loa
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Cotty
>
> The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
> use it for jamming in an end flap of the film box to remind me what's
> loaded...
>
if you hollow it out you'll be able to see what's on
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Body with viewfinder or just body???
Body with viewfinder. Preferably FA-1, but FA-1W may work too.
Dmitry
--
//DG LOC(NJ)
//*
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
Body with viewfinder or just body???
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Dmitry hi,
>> Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
>> could sell you one. Contact me off line.
>> Jonathan
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
>
> Dmitry hi,
> Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
> could sell you one. Contact me off line.
> Jonathan [ma...@redwoodhorses.com]
>
I'm looking for a body only. I'll email you off-list, thank you!
Dmitry
-
Dmitry hi,
Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
could sell you one. Contact me off line.
Jonathan [ma...@redwoodhorses.com]
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Dmitry Gromov
Sent: Sunday, May 13,
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:25 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> From: Dmitry Gromov
>>>
>> Yeah, I know about early and late models and the differences, wanted
>> to get newer one, hope it more common, but there is no way to know it
>> from KEH's description :(
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dmitry
>
>
> I think
From: Dmitry Gromov
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mark C wrote:
Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with ISO 6
- 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other differences. ?I
thi
The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
use it for jamming in an end flap of the film box to remind me what's
loaded...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi!
>
> Ok, thanks for the reminder about pentaxs.com - I remember this place
> was mentioned on the list before, should have searched better :)
> Going to ask Eric about current prices...
>
So, if anyone else cares (or interested) - I emailed Eric and got a reply.
LX CLA now costs $160, shippin
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Mark C wrote:
> On 5/14/2012 8:07 PM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I know about early and late models and the differences, wanted to
>> get newer one, hope it more common, but there is no way to know it from
>> KEH's description :( Thanks! Dmitry
>
>
> Yo
On 5/14/2012 8:07 PM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
Yeah, I know about early and late models and the differences, wanted
to get newer one, hope it more common, but there is no way to know it
from KEH's description :( Thanks! Dmitry
You might want to email KEH and ask about the sensitivity range. My LX
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mark C wrote:
> Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
>
> As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with ISO 6
> - 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other differences. I
> think that there w
Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with
ISO 6 - 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other
differences. I think that there were other variations within the
boarder "early' and "late'
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Last I checked Pentax was still servicing the LX. However probably the best
> place to send if for a CLA, if you know it doesn't need any parts is
> Pentaxs.com. Eric does excellent work for reasonable prices. He just
> recently started cha
Last I checked Pentax was still servicing the LX. However probably the
best place to send if for a CLA, if you know it doesn't need any parts
is Pentaxs.com. Eric does excellent work for reasonable prices. He
just recently started charging return postage but that's a small price
to pay for s
From: Dmitry Gromov
Hi! On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:31 AM, John Sessoms
wrote:
As far as I know, the only complaints about KEH were their offerings are low
when they're buying equipment. I would buy from KEH before I'd buy from
eBay.
My experience with KEH is their quality descriptions are v
Hi!
Thanks for the response, I'll email you off list.
But a question though - what is the current cost of CLA and what is
the good place in US to perform it (preferably NY/NJ/PA tri-state)? I
guess, Pentax no longer dealing with it?
Thanks!
Dmitry
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Miserere wrot
Well, Dmitry, I have an LX that I want to sell, but it needs a CLA.
Other than that it's in pretty good physical shape. If you might be
interested, e-mail me off-list.
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlig
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:31 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>
> As far as I know, the only complaints about KEH were their offerings are low
> when they're buying equipment. I would buy from KEH before I'd buy from
> eBay.
>
> My experience with KEH is their quality descriptions are very conserva
20 matches
Mail list logo
