It's all about individual usage, Bob. If I were shooting landscapes
hand-held, then I might miss it more, but shooting people (whether
indoors or out) I need at least 1/60s shutter speeds to stop movement,
and doing that with a 30mm lens means IS would be of no help. If I
were using a 60mm or 85mm,
That would kind of depend on the IQ of the sensor. Personally I think
the Sony Nex-7 with a KAF adapter module that contains a focusing motor
for legacy lenses. It looks like a much cleaner design.
On 4/19/2012 7:02 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Instead of the K-01
It's now on my short list.
I would miss having image stabilization. In the lens is okay, but it adds cost
over and over again, if you purchase multiple lenses. And since I frequently
shoot with longer lenses in low light, I'm a big fan of IBIS.
Paul
On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> I'll have to think a
I'll have to think about that Miserere.
IBIS had a big impact on my photography,
especially shooting indoor candids.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Miserere wrote:
> On 21 April 2012 11:28, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>> Image Stabilization...NO!!! - forget about it. Regards, B
On 21 April 2012 11:28, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Image Stabilization...NO!!! - forget about it. Regards, Bob S.
IS is in some of the lenses. Bob, I like IBIS as much as the next
Pentaxian, but let me tell you my practical experience. I'm able to
regularly shoot the 30mm handheld at 1/15s and g
On 19 April 2012 19:31, Darren Addy wrote:
> The only real downside in purchasing a Samsung digital camera is that
> it would, no doubt, contain a Samsung sensor.
Darren,
The new Samsung sensor (already found in the NX200) is much better
than the old one. It's not at the level of Sony's 16MP pix
Image Stabilization...NO!!! - forget about it. Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Miserere wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 19:02, Brian Walters wrote:
>> Instead of the K-01
>>
>> It's now on my short list.
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
>>
>>
On 19 April 2012 19:02, Brian Walters wrote:
> Instead of the K-01
>
> It's now on my short list.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Brian
I said that of the NX10 two years ago. It felt like a Pentax in all
the good ways.
—M.
\/\/
On 4/20/2012 09:23, Dario Bonazza wrote:
My reply:
Is the K-01 viewfinder better? ;-)
Dario
Though DxOMarks scores are not absolute truth, it appears that K-01
somehow looses in comparison to K-5. This and opportunity to get a
proper focusing screen for manual focusing made me buy (second h
It appears to house an eye-level EVF.
From: "knarftheria...@gmail.com"
If it's mirrorless what's the big bump on top for?
cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: April 19,
EVF + flash
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: knarftheria...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 4:48 PM
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: RE: Is this the Camera Pentax should have built?
If it's mirrorless what's the big bump on top for?
cheers,
Sure, this is what Pentax should have built instead of the K-01, in a
fantasy universe where EVFs are free and this camera doesn't therefore
cost several hundred bucks more than a K-01 (and almost as much as a
K-5). :)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Instead of the K-01...
If it's mirrorless what's the big bump on top for?
cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: April 19, 2012 4/19/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Is this the Camera P
Boris Liberman wrote:
On 4/20/2012 02:02, Brian Walters wrote:
Instead of the K-01
It's now on my short list.
http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
Well, not necessarily. A recent article on Luminous Landscape seems to
maintain that EVF dynamic range is so narrow th
This is my list of possible cameras Pentax should have built instead of the
K-01:
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Olympus OM-D (equipped with an APS sensor, of course)
Panasonic GX-1 (equipped with an APS sensor, of course)
and now... yes, also the Samsung NX20
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Brian
On 4/20/2012 02:02, Brian Walters wrote:
Instead of the K-01
It's now on my short list.
http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
Well, not necessarily. A recent article on Luminous Landscape seems to
maintain that EVF dynamic range is so narrow that in even in minimally
There is more to a camera than it's sensor, but I think it is
interesting that the only sensors that are rated *higher* than the K-5
(and the 645D which it ties in score) are the Nikon D3X, D4, D800 and
some Phase One backs.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
Quoting Paul Stenquist :
I wouldn't consider it if it has a Samsung sensor. Is it a pentax k-mount?
No - proprietary mount. A non-autofocus K mount adapter is available
from Samsung and some third parties also supply them.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
W
"Rangefinder-style mirrorless." Huh?
The photo sure looks like a DSLR with a swinging lcd screen.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I hate to refer to DxOmark, as it seems to result in a schism of
fanatical religious proportions whenever it is mentioned anywhere, but
if you want to feel better about your Pentax go to:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Ratings
Then in the camera MFG filter on the right, chec
Quoting Darren Addy :
The only real downside in purchasing a Samsung digital camera is that
it would, no doubt, contain a Samsung sensor.
Possibly, but I doubt Samsung has been sitting on its hands wrt sensor
design. It will be interesting to read the first in-depth reviews of
the NX20.
I wouldn't consider it if it has a Samsung sensor. Is it a pentax k-mount?
Paul
On Apr 19, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Instead of the K-01
>
> It's now on my short list.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
The only real downside in purchasing a Samsung digital camera is that
it would, no doubt, contain a Samsung sensor.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the dire
On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Instead of the K-01
>
> It's now on my short list.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/products/samsung/slrs/samsung_nx20
The EVIL world is starting to look quite interesting.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Penta
24 matches
Mail list logo