New glasses won't fix motion blur.
On 9/6/2014 10:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You might try a revised set of glasses.
I have no problem working with an LCD as viewfinder for certain kinds
of shooting. That said, I was interested in the K-01 as a vehicle for
a minimum 2-lens system (FA43/1.9
Depends what you pour into them
B
On 7 Sep 2014, at 20:05, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
New glasses won't fix motion blur.
On 9/6/2014 10:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You might try a revised set of glasses.
I have no problem working with an LCD as viewfinder for certain kinds
As long as it's above 90° proof, the details are generally unimportant.
On 9/7/2014 4:16 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Depends what you pour into them
B
On 7 Sep 2014, at 20:05, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:
New glasses won't fix motion blur.
On 9/6/2014 10:54 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You
He may be happy there's no viewfinder, but when I try to hold a camera
out where I can see that 3 LCD screen, my hands shake it's too blurry
to use anyway. I think it could have been a good (i.e. usable) design if
they'd just offered an optional EVF to attach to the hot-shoe.
I might even
You might try a revised set of glasses.
I have no problem working with an LCD as viewfinder for certain kinds of
shooting. That said, I was interested in the K-01 as a vehicle for a minimum
2-lens system (FA43/1.9 and DA21/3.2 Limited, my last and favorite Pentax
lenses...) but wanted an eye
On 05/09/2014 7:34 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
The K-01 was rightfully laughed at by photographers while at the same
time was praised in other circles and even won a design award.
The K-01 was/is a capable enough camera. Inside, it's just a somewhat
downgraded K-5 with the viewfinder stripped off.
Actually it's a downgraded K-30 which was a related but different beast
than the K-5. The downfall of the K-01 was it's cheapness, they reused
as much of the hardware from the K-r, and some of the electronics from
the upcoming K-30 with a smaller buffer, or maybe the same buffer size
as the
I think that sums it up pretty well. They didn't even really try. The
K-01 was just another me too product that was thrown together as
cheaply and with as little investment as possible.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:10 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually it's a downgraded K-30
on 2014-09-06 8:56 Bill wrote
I do fear for things like the Iphone, iPad, etc becoming ergonomic
nightmares in the name of styling at Newsons hands.
that sums up my concern, though i wouldn't quite expect a nightmare; i'd
worry Newson might bring incrementally less focus on user experience as
Marc is one of the most influential designers of his generation, So
influential that he managed to kill an entire line of Pentax products
before it was effectively born. A lot of manufactures copy if not the
actual product, the zeitgeist of Apple products, pretty much every smart
phone looks
The K-01 was rightfully laughed at by photographers while at the same
time was praised in other circles and even won a design award.
First and foremost I should speak about the design. Marc Newson has
done an astounding job with shape and feeling of the K-01. You may
have seen photos of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
