Well, you can recombine the Jpegs into a short movie...
Adam Maas wrote:
> On 1/24/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 23/01/08, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>
>>> Didn't they notice that 20fps 1.8megapixel option? They don't even
>>> mention it. Or was that
On Jan 24, 2008 1:05 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thibouille wrote:
> >
> > >They advertise 230.000 but it seems Pentax doesn't count the same way
> > >as others so we'll have to wait for reviews or first hand experience
> > >to
On 1/24/08, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thibouille wrote:
>
> >They advertise 230.000 but it seems Pentax doesn't count the same way
> >as others so we'll have to wait for reviews or first hand experience
> >to know exactly.
>
> There's been a bit of controversy with counting pixels o
Thibouille,
We take the pictures and let the others whine!
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 24, 2008 11:08 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course some do whine and claim ..."it is not and blabla anyway the
> K20D isn't even a 1Dmkxvi at US$300 so that's too bad Pentax did a big
> mistake that
Yeah I know ;)
It seems Pentax indeed communicates in pixel sizes when the others
give points (3 times more). Some comments do also point to a high-res
screen so I suppose it is indeed a high res one.
Of course some do whine and claim ..."it is not and blabla anyway the
K20D isn't even a 1Dmkxvi
I agree! Have to admit, as much as it offers, I'm a bit disappointed
there isn't a 5-6 fps burst rate option at a practical file size. RATS!
Jack
--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/23/08, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Perry Pe
Thibouille wrote:
>They advertise 230.000 but it seems Pentax doesn't count the same way
>as others so we'll have to wait for reviews or first hand experience
>to know exactly.
There's been a bit of controversy with counting pixels on LCD's because
they're like sensors in that each point is eith
> I bet there's no aperture simulator though.
>
Very impressive camera. If it had that, I'd pay to upgrade
tomorrow. Without it, I'll still have to think about it.
-Cory
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Thibouille wrote:
> They advertise 230.000 but it seems Pentax doesn't count the same way
> as others so we'll have to wait for reviews or first hand experience
> to know exactly.
>
One of the links said 230k, but said that each location had
individual RGB pixels. K
first hand experience
> to know exactly.
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 2:53 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -----
> > From: "Adam Maas"
> > Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
> >
> &g
They advertise 230.000 but it seems Pentax doesn't count the same way
as others so we'll have to wait for reviews or first hand experience
to know exactly.
On Jan 24, 2008 2:53 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ada
On 23/01/08, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >Didn't they notice that 20fps 1.8megapixel option? They don't even
> >mention it. Or was that something I dreamed earlier today?
>
You're right, there are * 20 FPS in Burst mode (115 pix buffer at 1.6M,
***, JPG); And now Penta
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
> I'm almsot positive the 20fps burst mode is nothing more than somebody
> getting the bright idea of hooking up the Live View feed to the JPEG
> engine. Useless in
On 1/24/08, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/01/08, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Didn't they notice that 20fps 1.8megapixel option? They don't even
> >mention it. Or was that something I dreamed earlier today?
>
> "We'd be willing to trade about half the resolution f
On Jan 24, 2008, at 2:34, Cotty wrote:
> On 23/01/08, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Didn't they notice that 20fps 1.8megapixel option? They don't even
>> mention it. Or was that something I dreamed earlier today?
>
> "We'd be willing to trade about half the resolution for a
On 23/01/08, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Didn't they notice that 20fps 1.8megapixel option? They don't even
>mention it. Or was that something I dreamed earlier today?
"We'd be willing to trade about half the resolution for a
doubled six-frame per second high-speed burst
On 1/23/08, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks"
> Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
>
>
> > Arg. Batteries.
> >
> > Four Nikon Dslr's with three batteries an
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
> Arg. Batteries.
>
> Four Nikon Dslr's with three batteries and chargers, then one for the
> K10D. Hopefully they are the same on the K20D, i'm running
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
>I suggests SFM, Silly Fart Mode as the official PDML abbrerivation for this
> burst mode feature.
Perhaps the supplied software will allow the bursts to be stitched tog
t;
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Maas"
> Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
>
>
>
>
> >> It looks like they've changed the battery though. I might have some K10
> >> batteries for sale in a few months...
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: Popular Photography posts K20D first looks
>> It looks like they've changed the battery though. I might have some K10
>> batteries for sale in a few months...
> Nope, the D-Li50 is the same NP400 cl
I suggests SFM, Silly Fart Mode as the official PDML abbrerivation for this
burst mode feature.
Tim Typo
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: Popular Ph
On Jan 23, 2008 7:12 PM, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008, at 17:16, Perry Pellechia wrote:
>
> > More good press (some negative) for Pentax:
> >
> > http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5049/first-look-pentax-k20d.html
> >
>
> I liked this one:
>
> "First, it would be great
On Jan 23, 2008, at 17:16, Perry Pellechia wrote:
> More good press (some negative) for Pentax:
>
> http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5049/first-look-pentax-k20d.html
>
I liked this one:
"First, it would be great to see a pixel-shedding ultra-high speed
burst rate. We'd be willing to trade about
On 1/23/08, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Perry Pellechia"
>
>
> > More good press (some negative) for Pentax:
> >
> > http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5049/first-look-pentax-k20d.html
>
> Apparently, I won't have to buy a new battery grip, and it
- Original Message -
From: "Perry Pellechia"
> More good press (some negative) for Pentax:
>
> http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5049/first-look-pentax-k20d.html
Apparently, I won't have to buy a new battery grip, and it has a PC socket.
Thank you Pentax
It looks like they've changed
I was actually the only amateur in there, they
apparantly wanted more but none hand mailed them so I
got in by default. No I won't autograph sliks I still
want a manfrotto :-)
--- Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that was you, but I couldn't find your
> last name at the tim
Just to clarify, my last note with this subject was aimed at Brendan.
This was probably pretty obvious, but I clicked the wrong button and
didn't copy the old message in.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don
Thanks for the Grandfather Mountain invite, Mark. One of these times
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>FA 80-200 f2.8. Incredible. Sharp wide open across the zoom range. Can I
>afford this lens? Do I want to carry it's weight?
Once you've used it and seen the results, the weight becomes a non-issue. Price?
Well, it's a non-issue *after* you've bought it
Popular Photography changed the SQF system recently and scores from past
tests are not comparable with the new system - I don't remember when the 35
f2 was tested, but I think that the scores from it and the 31 LTD are on
two different scales. The new system was meant to be more stringent.
-
IL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of T Rittenhouse
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Popular Photography 31/1.8 Limited test (WAS:
> Re: Pentax a "best ever prime lens" at Pop?)
>
>
> lpm
&g
lpm
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: Popular Photography 31/1.8 Limited test (WAS: Re: Pe
Ed,
What does the number between the f/stop and the letter grade stand for?
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>OK, I looked it up. Just for kicks, here's a comparison by the numbers
>of their current review of the 31 vs. their review of the 35 F2.0. I'm
>only giving the numbers at the 20"x24" end,
> And what exactly do they say about this lens?
>
> Pål
> -
>
Popular Photography never says that an advertiser's lenses are bad.
Still, the writer seemed especially effusive in praising the 31. I go by
the numbers in their MTF tests. According to these numbers, the lens is
consistently sharp at
>And what exactly do they say about this lens?
Just some pointless and meaningless comments, nothing haven't been said
before.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Don't have that issue, and believe, it would be difficult to get that
particular issue. One thing, however, can assure you - Tokina lenses are
very very good. I have been using 28-105 on my Minolta X700 and Nikon N90s.
Too good results. Only one negative point I have is the zoom with its o
Hi Richard,
Can't help you with Pop. Phot. 95, but these links will be useful for the
Tokina 28-70 enablement ;-)
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/35mm_zoom_lenses/product_5593.asp
http://www.photozone.de/reviews/tokina2870.htm
http://www.jdhphotography.com/Tokina/Tokina-28-70.html
38 matches
Mail list logo
