On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 01:05 PM, David Brooks wrote:
In that low light,do you try and take a
meter reading or just use 1600 and 3200 speed film
and shoot 1 1/60 wide openish
I had just picked up the LX, so I was a little wary of its meter still,
so I just took a few general readings
Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:12:48 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
As promised, some Hoosier Daddy in the studio. Pardon the pooched
thumbnails, and sorry about the java...that's the price I gotta pay
On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 07:56 AM, David Brooks wrote:
What was the lighting.
Couple of 60W bulbs, but on rheostats and turned down for 'mood'. The
room where Moe was recording her vocal tracks was more brightly lit.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 07:56 AM, David Brooks wrote:
What was the lighting.
Couple of 60W bulbs, but on rheostats and turned down
for 'mood'. The
room where Moe was recording her vocal tracks was more brightly lit.
-Aaron
Just want to do a good job,who knows were this
may go.Going to try Cotty's plastic bouncy
thingy,made one today.When i checked the flash
(af280t)on the minolta iv meter there was a 1
stop difference from no plastic bouncy to
bouncy.
Ta da! Fame at last!
I like a bit of plastic bouncy
]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
Just want to do a good job,who knows were this
may go.Going to try Cotty's plastic bouncy
thingy,made one today.When i checked the flash
(af280t)on the minolta iv meter there was a 1
stop difference from no plastic bouncy
As promised, some Hoosier Daddy in the studio. Pardon the pooched
thumbnails, and sorry about the java...that's the price I gotta pay for
a free drag-and-drop webpage. ;)
http://homepage.mac.com/aaronreynolds/PhotoAlbum7.html
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Nice job.
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
-
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:20 AM
Subject: RE; Studio band info
If you can find any, Konica 3200 should give you that grainy muted look.
It's been discontinued so you may be stuck with Fuji 1600 (much
Thanks Brendan.I think i'll try and pick up some 800 and some 1600 if
possible.As for lenses i have a N35-70 f 2.8 and a P M50f1.7.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
Shoot some
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:10:08 -0500, David Brooks wrote:
Hi Bruce.I have the 35-70 and 80-200 f2.8 for the D1.The head band
guy is a
PS wiz and will fix anything he said i'll take.
Told him,pride comes in here,i want t do a bang up job,not a shoot
and fix.
I plan
I'm not sure that 2.8 lenses will do it. Fixing color
balance in PS isn't cheating. As much as we all like to
get it right in the camera, don't get carried away
with being macho about it.
Doesn't the D1 have a max ISO setting of 1600? That
should get you plenty of grain. I suspect the 35-70
: Studio Band info
I'm not sure that 2.8 lenses will do it. Fixing
color
balance in PS isn't cheating. As much as we all
like to
get it right in the camera, don't get carried
away
with being macho about it.
Doesn't the D1 have a max ISO setting of 1600?
That
should get you plenty of grain. I
sounds like tri-x country to me...
remember, you push it up to 3200...
what's a little grain?
Brendan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Get some Ektachrome tungsten film. Bring some photofloods and reflectors
to add to the illumination of the existing tungsten lights.
Paul
David Brooks wrote:
Hi Group.Need some help here.
My friends that have the blues band have asked
me ,on Sunday, to come down ,and take candid
shots at
Brendan.I thought Tri-x was BW.The boys had
some Delta 3200 in Set. but would like some
colour shots.Any suggestions,I have a dayG
Dave
sounds like tri-x country to me...
remember, you push it up to 3200...
what's a little grain?
Brendan
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
Well, if you have a fast prime, the D1 will be easiest
since you can set the white balance, turn up the gain
and see what you're getting. Fuji 800 (NPZ) is probably
the film of choice. Any filter to balance it to tungsten
light will eat too much light. Shoot it straight, and
fix it in
I recommend renting some serious flash equipment. But then you don't have
much time to learn how to set it up for the best lighting.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: David
from now until noOn SAT.fUJI OR kODAK
Opps Vodka taking hold
Dave
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
Well, if you have a fast prime, the D1 will be easiest
since you can set the white
Thanks Tom.Nope I 'v got 24 hours.I/m working on non horsey adranaline here.
Dave
BTW God or bad you folk are gona see these.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Studio Band info
I
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:10:08 -0500, David Brooks wrote:
Hi Bruce.I have the 35-70 and 80-200 f2.8 for the D1.The head band
guy is a
PS wiz and will fix anything he said i'll take.
Told him,pride comes in here,i want t do a bang up job,not a shoot
and fix.
I plan to take the D1 fer ser(valley talk
21 matches
Mail list logo
