I'm glad somebody does...
Mishka wrote:
thanx for explaining -- i feel MUCH better now :)
best,
mishka
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:42:20 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Damn now you made me look it up.
For the baseball predictor it has nothing to do with City.
(...)
Mishka wrote:
thanx for explaining -- i feel MUCH better now :)
best,
mishka
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:42:20 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damn now you made me look it up.
>
> For the baseball predictor it has nothing to do with City.
> (...)
>
> Mishka wrote:
>
> >i believe both were bos
On Mar 9, 2005, at 5:31 AM, Jostein wrote:
Hm...
In sync with the years of minimum solar activity in the sunspot
cycles...:-)
How's that for economic theory?
I do remember reading something recently about the sunspot cycle
affecting solar radiation which in turn affects crop yields which then
a
Damn now you made me look it up.
For the baseball predictor it has nothing to do with City.
From 1952 to 1976 if the American League (AL) won the world series the
Republicans would win the presidency. If the National League (NL) won
the series the Democrats won the Presidency. (100%). Since 197
I thought of the posibility of it be connected to the sunspot cycle, but that
did not change due to WWII (grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECT
i believe both were boston (red sox and patriots -- man, i have been
living in this country
far too long! ), no clash
best,
mishka
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:42:11 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Superbowl and World Series were pretty good predictors of the US
> Presidency, this
Superbowl and World Series were pretty good predictors of the US
Presidency, this year they clashed, I
can't remember which won.
Doug Franklin wrote:
Hi Jostein,
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:31:59 +0100, Jostein wrote:
Hm...
In sync with the years of minimum solar activity in the sunspot
cycles...:
Hi Jostein,
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:31:59 +0100, Jostein wrote:
> Hm...
> In sync with the years of minimum solar activity in the sunspot
> cycles...:-)
>
> How's that for economic theory?
Well, it's really more of a hypothesized predictor. As one, it's no
worse than the "which conference won
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No surprise that the F6 is selling well. Most of the problem with
camera sales was not digital cameras, but the world economic
conditions. But things are on the rise again now. I'vw mentioned an 11
year economic cy
- Original Message -
From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No surprise that the F6 is selling well. Most of the problem with
camera sales was not digital cameras, but the world economic
conditions. But things are on the rise again now. I'vw mentioned an
11 year economic cycle many times,
Actually there are four major cycles, the 11 year cycle you mention is
somewhat in dispute.
Graywolf wrote:
No surprise that the F6 is selling well. Most of the problem with
camera sales was not digital cameras, but the world economic
conditions. But things are on the rise again now. I'vw ment
No surprise that the F6 is selling well. Most of the problem with camera sales
was not digital cameras, but the world economic conditions. But things are on
the rise again now. I'vw mentioned an 11 year economic cycle many times, and no
one listens. I find it strange that none of the so-called e
SL> the catalog that was presented recently by the man himself. It's a
SL> VERY LARGE file (~12MB) for only 37 pages. If anyone wants a copy,
SL> I'll be happy to post it at my personal site for download. Perhaps
SL> someone with a copy of Acrobat would be willing to resize it?
Hi Scott, you ca
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:45:46 +0100, Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-mar-05.shtml
> Interestng conclusions. And information that new Nikon F6 sells very well is
> surprising too. Apparently there are a lot of people still using film for
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
