Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, > Good grief, a boat from Japan to Canada sank in the Atlantic Ocean? That > would take some serious doing. it was a Pentax boat. The captain didn't see the enormous digital iceberg heading towards him... Bob

Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Bruce Dayton
Ever since I moved up format from 35mm to 67 - many of the concerns and worries about what Pentax and the others were doing/planning in the 35mm world ceased to concern me. I just got back proofs from a wedding I shot over the weekend - 8 rolls of 120 and 2 rolls of 35mm. The 35mm was shot on the

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Brad Dobo
Lol, you guys are diffusing my anger ;-) - Original Message - From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:59 PM Subject: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-) > Hi, >

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Brad Dobo
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-) No doubt. 35mm cannot compete, and it's dying an

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Pentxuser
Brad I competely disagree. 35mm is not dying and yes it can compete. It depends on what you are shooting and how large you are going to blow it up. Many shots are taken with 35mm equipment that could not be taken with larger format equipment. Many people like larger format because they are impre

RE: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread J. C. O'Connell
L PROTECTED] [mailto:Pentxuser@;aol.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-) > > > Brad I competely disagree. 35mm is not dying and yes it can compete. It > depends on what you are sh

RE: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-30 Thread Shaun Canning
O'Connell [mailto:hifisapi@;gate.net] Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2002 03:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-) I disagree, I can see a difference between 35mm and medium format even in a print as small as 8X10. As for 11X14, I'm not sure if 4X5 ne

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-31 Thread Pentxuser
I'm with you Shaun Vic In a message dated 10/31/02 12:17:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Sure MF provides undoubtedly better detail and quality in each neg or pos. However, humble old 35mm gear can still churn out some stunners when we put our minds too it. Making the interneg was definitely

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-31 Thread Steve Desjardins
LOL. That is probably how Pentax would go, however. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 04:59PM >>> Hi, > Good grief, a boat from Japan to Canada sank in

RE: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-31 Thread Steve Desjardins
folks always talk about 35 mm "dying" and then talk about quality of images. If 35 mm is dying, it has nothing to do with image quality, but with competition for other media such as digital. If image quality were the primary issue, the ratio of 35 mm film sales to 120 film sales would be differen

Re: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-)

2002-10-31 Thread Brad Dobo
TECTED]> To: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: Re[2]: Brad's Pentax Gripe Gets Nasty ;-) > Hi, > > Perhaps it was the flagship that went down with all handgrips and > cable releases while bearing Brad's