William,
The biggest flaw I see to Tom's observations is when you bounce or
diffuse the flash. How would the body go about knowing that is what
you are doing? In those cases, you should see severe underexposure.
My experience is that they work fine.
Bruce Dayton
Wednesday, March 13, 2002,
On 13 Mar 2002 at 14:03, Bruce Dayton wrote:
William,
The biggest flaw I see to Tom's observations is when you bounce or
diffuse the flash. How would the body go about knowing that is what
you are doing? In those cases, you should see severe underexposure.
My experience is that they
Today's state-of-the-art flash exposure system basically combines
the matrix metering with pondering the flash output according to focus
distance info. The pre-flash - required to compute main flash output -
is very short (likely less than 1/100 of the total power) and very
close to the main
Recently Alin Flaider wrote:
To me it doesn't matter much as long as I still
have to compensate to avoid getting 16% grays out of deep blacks
tuxedos or pure white petals. And, as long as I have to think about
colour reflectivity, why not take the time and do the compensation
trick for too
4 matches
Mail list logo
