Frantisek may be right. One reason I don't use my CZJ 20/2.8 that often is
that the resulting pictures look so "normal." I'm among the lucky few who
own it in a retrofitted K mount. But it's not autodiaphgram; the view will
grow dim as you stop down.
Frantisek Vlcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
T
> What seems to be the consensus for the best (in terms of optical
> quality and build) for a wide angle lens less than 28mm. I am
> looking for a good, clean, and razor sharp lens with an angle of
> view greater than 90(degrees) for some landscape work. It is very
> important that the distortio
Hi,
I don't know who Frantisek was quoting, but I know he responded to the following:
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
> vvn> 20/4 Carl Zeiss Jena (77mm filter). Not as sharp as the later 20/2.8 (which
> vvn> shares the basic optical formula with the Pentax 20/2.8),
But, I have read that the Ziess Jena
vvn> 20/4 Carl Zeiss Jena (77mm filter). Not as sharp as the later 20/2.8 (which
vvn> shares the basic optical formula with the Pentax 20/2.8), but the 20/4 is
vvn> probably more rectilinear than any othe 20. All but the last batch were
vvn> single coated. And I'm araid none were K mount, just som
Jason Vick wrote:
What seems to be the consensus for the best (in terms of optical quality
and build) for a wide angle lens less than 28mm. I am looking for a good,
clean, and razor sharp lens with an angle of view greater than 90(degrees)
for some landscape work. It is very important that the
What seems to be the consensus for the best (in terms of optical quality and
build) for a wide angle lens less than 28mm. I am looking for a good,
clean, and razor sharp lens with an angle of view greater than 90(degrees)
for some landscape work. It is very important that the distortions be
mini
6 matches
Mail list logo
