't process film yourself?
>>
>>I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>>Sent: Thursday, October 19,
>>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>>>Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:27 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&g
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:54:11 +
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
If you're shooting color neg film, C-41 process is fairly standard.
However, I still find that most color films process better
- Original Message -
From: "J and K Messervy"
Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
> And if you don't process film yourself?
Then you should..
>
> I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
Colour negative film doesn't respon
ROTECTED]>
> And if you don't process film yourself?
>
> I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sen
---
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
>
>
> > And, of course, with B&W film, there's a lot more control on th
Use a lab that does custom processing and run some tests first.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: J and K Messervy
> And if you don't process film yourself?
> I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Shel Belinkoff"
> > And, of cou
And if you don't process film yourself?
I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Remedi
And, of course, with B&W film, there's a lot more control on the processing
end, so one can "over expose" the film, or expose for the shadows, and
develop for the highlights, so that there are no blown highlights. So, for
a Q&D example, you can rate TX @ 200, cut back the standard processing time
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:29:37PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Your example is extreme, but most films seem to be slightly overrated
> in regard to ISO.
Hardly. The ISO testing procedure is well-defined, and rigorously
followed. If a film says ISO 400 on the box, you can be darn sure
that
- Original Message -
From: James
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:37 PM
Subject: Remedial film photography. :)
> Can someone please explain to me the reason that people load 50 iso
> film and shoot
> it with the camera set at 12 iso (numbers just for example).
My fave
Your example is extreme, but most films seem to be slightly overrated
in regard to ISO. I always shot Portra 400 at 320 and Portra 160 at
100. I shot Delta 3200 at 1600. I shot TMax 400 at 200 then processed
it gently in a d-76 1:1 soup. It's all in determining what works for
you with the p
It moves the exposure up, or down, the sensitivity curve. Giving more
weight to the shadows, or highlights. Simple as that. It takes a bit of
experience to know when to do which.
Most wedding pros shot color negative about 2/3 stop slow (100 v 160)
because most of the labs were calibrated to ma
Can someone please explain to me the reason that people load 50 iso film and
shoot
it with the camera set at 12 iso (numbers just for example).
What are the benefits of doing this? It doesn't change the speed of the
film...just
the speed the camera's meter thinks the film is. I assume it i
14 matches
Mail list logo
