Re: SMC-M 24-35/3.5 rarity?

2002-02-25 Thread mike wilson
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > .my subjective impression is that I wouldn't gain much now by swapping the 24-35 >for, say, a K 24/2.8. > > Any thoughts? For starters; non-rotating front element, dof scale, lighter weight. The first two, for me, are quite major gripes. Not _quite_ enough

Re: SMC-M 24-35/3.5 rarity?

2002-02-25 Thread clivew
Those of us that have 'em seem to like 'em, although those I've seen advertised lately are priced a lot higher than mine was. What I actually wanted was a fixed 24mm, but the 24-35 happened along at the right moment. Shel may have a view on this, but apart from an extra half-stop and a slight