Different standards I suppose, or different lenses. I will agree that
it becomes razor sharp at
f8.0.
Fred wrote:
It's very good, it follows the usual Pentax normal lens
characteristics, a bit soft, (by prime lens standards), wide open.
Very sharp when stopped down to 5.6 or 8.
I would
It's very good, it follows the usual Pentax normal lens characteristics,
a bit soft, (by prime lens standards), wide open. Very sharp when
stopped down to
5.6 or 8.
Thibouille wrote:
Anyone got this lens ?
Is it a good one (relatively) ?
Thanks for your input.
Thibouille
I have one.
I like it as much as any of my other 50's.
I've also got M 2, M 1.4, A 1.7.
Thibouille wrote:
Anyone got this lens ?
Is it a good one (relatively) ?
Thanks for your input.
Thibouille
Hi, Lasse.
Always nice to see that you're still around and to get your
comments, as I know how well founded they are.
Well, I don't know about the well founded part - Har!, but I do
chip in once in a while, when I think I might have something to add.
Thanks for the link. I never saw your
It's good. Resolutionwise, if you shoot it at f 8 or f 11, it's
as good as it gets.
I'd also say, based upon my own testing, that it's quite good at f/8
or f/11, but quite soft, on the other hand, at wider apertures.
See: http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/resolutn.htm
Build quality is quite
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: SMC K 55mm 1.8
It's good. Resolutionwise, if you shoot it at f 8 or f 11, it's
as good as it gets.
I'd also say, based upon my own testing, that it's quite good at f/8
or f/11
Anyone got this lens ?
Is it a good one (relatively) ?
Thanks for your input.
Thibouille
Is it optically identical to the 42mm SMC Takumar?
John
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:10:31 -0400, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only relative to the very best lenses ever made. Relative to the rest it
is merely fabulous. In all seriousness, it has a very good reputation.
--
Thibouille wrote:
8 matches
Mail list logo
