On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:51 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> I talked to a Norwegian Pentax rep about this, and
> he said you need a Pentax diagnostic software module hooked up to the
> camera
Tell them we already have one
Dave
>
> Jostein
>
> 2011/2/22 Larry Colen :
>> I thought that I read somewhere tha
Larry,
PentaxForums.com has made an effort to map serial numbers and faulty
cameras, but it's a futile exercise because the serial number on the
bottom of the camera tells you nothing about the production batch of
the CCD assembly. I talked to a Norwegian Pentax rep about this, and
he said you nee
Oh, next thing you'd be asking, Larry, is betting sequences for next
season of High Stakes Poker...
I reckon, it is pretty much random. You can look it up on Pentax Forums,
as I believe the spirits are still high over there regarding this issue,
but I digress.
Boris
On 2/22/2011 8:52 PM, L
All of the recently produced cameras should be fine. Among the early cameras,
some were stained and some were not. Both mine and Bills were early and clean.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2011, at 8:45 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>> I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain ser
From: Larry Colen
I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial
number were not affected by the sensor stain issue.
But, I cannot find what that serial number is.
It'll be the next serial number after the one you buy. ;-D
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jack Davis
[jdavi...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Sensor stain serial number range
"Everything starting with 3970... should be stain free."
That's the
"Everything starting with 3970... should be stain free."
That's the word from an old dp head.
Jack
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Larry Colen wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
> Subject: Sensor stain serial number range
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tue
rofl... so you're one of the 10 people...
2011/2/22 Mark Roberts :
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:59:54 +0100, Eckinator wrote:
>
>>nope. 670 - the neighbor of the beast - (or Yurpeean 668 the neighbour...)
>
> 1010011010 - the number of the binary beast.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@p
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:59:54 +0100, Eckinator wrote:
>nope. 670 - the neighbor of the beast - (or Yurpeean 668 the neighbour...)
1010011010 - the number of the binary beast.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial number were
> not affected by the sensor stain issue.
> But, I cannot find what that serial number is.
Same as Mr Burn's Social Insurance number, 000 000 001
Dave
>
> --
> Larry
nope. 670 - the neighbor of the beast - (or Yurpeean 668 the neighbour...)
2011/2/22 Mark Roberts :
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:53:50 +0100, Eckinator wrote:
>
>>2011/2/22 Larry Colen :
>>> I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial number were
>>> not affected by the sensor st
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:53:50 +0100, Eckinator wrote:
>2011/2/22 Larry Colen :
>> I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial number were
>> not affected by the sensor stain issue.
>> But, I cannot find what that serial number is.
>>
>42 =)
666?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
42 =)
2011/2/22 Larry Colen :
> I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial number were
> not affected by the sensor stain issue.
> But, I cannot find what that serial number is.
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
I thought that I read somewhere that K-5 after a certain serial number were not
affected by the sensor stain issue.
But, I cannot find what that serial number is.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listi
14 matches
Mail list logo
