IMO, the rectangular hoods, not the square,k like they used to
make for the 50mm M lenses are the best. BTW, If someone has
one they want to sell please e-mail me.
--Tom
dosk wrote:
Read an article in a photomag by an older, experienced writer whom I
respect. He says these new tulip
Read an article in a photomag by an older, experienced writer whom I
respect. He says these new tulip shaped "perfect hoods" are anything but!
Seems their odd scooped-out shapes allow all kinds of flare and glare into
the lens. Man says nothing beats a $5 (imperfect?) rubber lens hood for
Recently dosk wrote:
Read an article in a photomag by an older, experienced writer whom I
respect. He says these new tulip shaped "perfect hoods" are anything but!
Seems their odd scooped-out shapes allow all kinds of flare and glare into
the lens. Man says nothing beats a $5 (imperfect?)
on 3/7/01 12:41 PM, dosk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but I cannot follow your logic and understand almost nothing of
what you're talking about here. The article I read had all kinds of flare
tests performed, with results that stated that the "perfect" hood was
definitely not
On 7 Mar 2001, at 10:28, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Having just spent all of 60 seconds thining on this topic, and having done
no experiments, my gut reaction is to disagree. The "tulip" shape is due
to the fact that we are trying to cut out the potions of the light cone
that are outside of
5 matches
Mail list logo
