Jon Hope wrote:
Enough rambling. A couple of questions. Is there a good system to utilise
to catelogue and file my photographs that anyone would care to recommend?
by far the best (and all the Pros I know use it) is a large
array of drawers to which more drawers can be added
the thumbnails with the above mentioned system.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Hope" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:09 AM
Subject: Sorta OT. Perusing previous photographs
Hi all
I was looking for a ph
Jon Hope wrote:
Enough rambling. A couple of questions. Is there a good system to utilise
to catelogue and file my photographs that anyone would care to recommend?
And secondly, do you people go through the photographs you have taken on
any sort of regular basis?
I use the numbering system
Recently Provencher, Paul M. wrote:
Jon wrote Is there a good system to utilise to catelogue and file my
photographs that anyone would care to recommend?
...
Basically start with the date noted as YYMMDD, then add on the roll number
for that day in the format NN where NN is a two digit
Jon wrote Is there a good system to utilise to catelogue and file my
photographs that anyone would care to recommend?
There are a number of "systems" but the most important thing is that you do
it on an ongoing basis. That allows you to manage it in smaller chunks and
to record the info at a
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Recently Provencher, Paul M. wrote:
Jon wrote Is there a good system to utilise to catelogue and file my
photographs that anyone would care to recommend?
...
This would, of course, not work for those of us who do not manage to shoot
an entire film on a
This is a good numbering system, similar to the one I
use. I'd like to suggest a small addition, which I have
found to help me out. At the beginning of each
string of numbers I have a letter indicating which
camera I used. For my PZ-1p, the letter is Z, the LX
gets X.
Since I tend to shoot
I like it - but there is no way I could bring myself to throw any away.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Bojidar Dimitrov" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Sorta O
a
pretty small font to get it on a sticker that will fit a slide mount...
ppro
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brewer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sorta OT. Perusing previous photographs
This is a good numbering
You could use the day you got the film processed as the number. Easy
enough. What you do with the rest of the data (or if you even use a number)
is the freedom you enjoy by doing it yourself!
You could try to use the demo database that comes with Office 97
Professional Edition (Access
At 05:26 22/03/01, you wrote:
Hi all again.
Thanks for your suggestions. Everything sounds like a lot of work, but what
isn't these days?
I think I'll catalogue them all along some of the lines mentioned. I
usually use a roll of film on one subject type, so cataloguing them like
that isn't
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:01:36 -0500, tom wrote:
I use the numbering system someone else recommended - mmddyynn. I put
If you instead use YYMMDDNN then any software in the world can
accurately sort them by date (I'm assuming 'nn' is the roll number for
that day).
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is
Paul Provencher writes:
010321-01-05 - The fifth frame of the first roll shot on March 21, 2001.
I use a similar kind of system which I made up myself. It goes "format-
month/year-[film type+roll number]-frame".
For example, "6x7-3/2001-S1-4" means 6x7 format, shot (actually I use the
13 matches
Mail list logo
