I
had a 300 f4 'K' for some time always wanted to try the M* or A* but never
got one.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:21:51 +0200
Sub
love a 300mm f2.8 but just can't justify the cost, I do not need to use
my photographic skills to earn a living (unfortunately!)
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
ECTED]
Sendt: 5. juli 2004 20:04
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Teleconverter Crap
> 1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
> putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal
> lens.)
I don't recall anyone mentioning wide angle.
>
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 10:40:28 -0700
Subject: Re: Teleconverter Crap
> Bob's laws of teleconverter use:
>
> 1.Using a teleconverter with a
"Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bob's laws of teleconverter use:
>
>1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
>putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal lens.)
>2.Teleconverters are really only useful on fast lenses. You can put a
Bob's laws of teleconverter use:
1.Using a teleconverter with a wide angle lens is nutsoid. (imagine
putting a 2X on a 24 or 28mm f/2.8 to obtain a really slow normal lens.)
2.Teleconverters are really only useful on fast lenses. You can put a 2X
converter on a 300 f/4, but then you get a
6 matches
Mail list logo
