: Test of DA 40 f2.8 Limited
Interesting. Of course all I did was compare picutres. Here are
two
crops from full 6 mp JPGs.
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
Were these taken at the same shutter speed as well as aperture Steve?
Differences are slight but my eyes seem to see slightly better
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: Test of DA 40 f2.8 Limited
Interesting. Of course all I did was compare picutres. Here are two
crops from full 6 mp JPGs.
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
Were these taken at the same shutter speed as well as aperture Steve?
Differences are slight
You know, I was doing just fine resisting this lens and contenting
myself with my old M40 2.8. Then some do-gooder has to start this
thread about getting nice results and before I know it I'm hitting the
submit button on the BH check-out page. So instead of a new zoom or
something useful I now
--- Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lens came in yesterday. It's nice having the AF but the exposure
part is nice. I really like normal lenses and this is nearly perfect on
the *istDS. A quick comparison of identical shots with the M40 and the
DA 40 look the same when zoomed
Subject: Re: Test of DA 40 f2.8 Limited
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
--- Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lens came in yesterday. It's nice having the AF but the exposure
part is nice. I really like normal lenses and this is nearly perfect on
the *istDS. A quick
On 4/21/05, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I was doing just fine resisting this lens and contenting
myself with my old M40 2.8. Then some do-gooder has to start this
thread about getting nice results and before I know it I'm hitting the
submit button on the BH check-out
Have you tried it on a film body? Does it cover 35mm frame? I'd expect it
should as the SMC-M version obvoiusly does.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17/04/05 18:22:15
Yesterday I tested this pup against the DA 16-45 f4 at 40 mm. and
--- Nick Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried it on a film body? Does it cover 35mm frame? I'd expect it
should
as the SMC-M version obvoiusly does.
Many users have reported the DA40 covers 24x36mm w/o light-fall-off. But none
has
been able to tell how's the edge/corner sharpness so
Glad to read your results, cause I ordered the lens three days ago...
Cant't wait to have it on my cam for allround use and with a pocket-able
size!
Yesterday I tested this pup against the DA 16-45 f4 at 40 mm. and the FA
50 f1.7. The test set-up was my usual arrangement: mud-brick wall,
tripod, autofocus, ISO 200. Once in Photoshop, every image got Auto
Levels only; comparisons were done at Actual Pixels. Test distance was
about 40X the
10 matches
Mail list logo
