Hey, I didn't know it was Friday.
-graywolf
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Brendan wrote:
>
> The 67 would be the best if it had AF and a 1/12000
> shutter.
...and interchangeable digital backs...
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gal
The 67 would be the best if it had AF and a 1/12000
shutter.
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan wrote:
> >
> > Hey I'm allowed to be wrong, it's freedom of
> speach.
>
> I agree. ;)
>
> -Aaron
>
> p.s. the MZ-5n would be perfect if it shot 67 and
> had the LX's meter in
Brendan wrote:
>
> Hey I'm allowed to be wrong, it's freedom of speach.
I agree. ;)
-Aaron
p.s. the MZ-5n would be perfect if it shot 67 and had the LX's meter in it.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don
Hey I'm allowed to be wrong, it's freedom of speach. I
do want a cheaper MZ-S tho but at the rate the prices
are comming down I won't have to wait that long :)
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan wrote:
> >
> > Fine we'll bring back the Super Program just for
> you.
>
> Bren
Brendan wrote:
>
> Fine we'll bring back the Super Program just for you.
Brendan, your lineup has more duplication than the current one. Why
have the MZ-5n and MZ-3 both there? The differences are marginal. It
would be like keeping the MZ-5 and the MZ-5n in the lineup.
And why axe the MZ-30
Big Z Little Z what begins with Z.
Shel wrote
> ZZZzz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
ns
or an AF lens in manual mode.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brendan
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The 5n could be the best if ...
Actually axe the mz-30, move the mz-7 into
Super Program ... nah, you can keep it an an extinct species. It has
absolutely no appeal to me. Thanks for the offer, though .
Brendan wrote:
>
> Fine we'll bring back the Super Program just for you.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Fine we'll bring back the Super Program just for you.
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ZZZzz
>
> Brendan wrote:
>
> > Actually axe the mz-30, move the mz-7 into it's
> spot,
> > then move the mz-5n down to where the mz-7 was,
> put
> > the mz-3 in the 5n's place and then
The MZ5n should be discontinued and the MZ3 should take its place.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Dombek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: The 5n could be the
... it also had:
1. The ability to use the ZX-M focusing screen.
2. Brighter viewfinder indication (or at least less prone to glare.)
3. The ability to use an old fashioned cable release.
_
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Ma
Thats why there is the MZ-3 and MZ-S, I do like the
idea of a spot meter button like on the PZ-20 but that
one only works in manual mode.
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and foll
... if it
1. Had 1/250 flash sync, and
2. Did not have that eye-sore panorama switch, and instead
3. Had the spotmeter button there, which should be a button,
not a mode, so that can be used to evaluate parts of the
scene in any mode,
and, although not critical b
14 matches
Mail list logo
