Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Boris Liberman
On 1/10/2013 9:58 AM, Larry Colen wrote: From my experience shooting in very low light, I don't tend to like to push the ISO on the K-5 past 12,800. Sometimes I'll go as high as 16,000 when I don't have any choice. Last night I was photographing a benefit concert for a friend whose house had bu

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" Subject: The K-5 continues to surprise me On the not so happy side, I don't know how many of my shots were lost due to the camera focusing on the microphone. Even when I'm using a focus point on the far side of the d

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Rob Studdert
On 11 January 2013 09:25, Charles Robinson wrote: > > I'm looking forward to shooting at higher ISOs with the K5 and leaving the > aperture at 4 or 5.6. This will let AF (and my poor MF) not have to be so > spot-on. > > At least that is my working theory. We'll see how this pans out. Good the

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jan 10, 2013, at 16:20 , Rob Studdert wrote: > > Cyclic coloured lighting is the bane of my existence when shooting > concerts, the focus shifts as the colours cycle. I've taken to using > centre point focus, disconnecting the AF action from the shutter > button and using the back AF button an

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Rob Studdert
On 11 January 2013 07:22, Bruce Walker wrote: > I find that when using AF with stage performers you need to acquire > focus and fire the shutter immediately. If you go manual, then you > have to be riding the focus constantly and firing the shutter whenever > you think you've got it. Cyclic colo

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Paul Stenquist
On Jan 10, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Larry answered: >> I asked: >>> Larry Colen wrote: hitting the focus lock too early >>> >>> Can you expand on that? Do you not just half-press the shutter release >>> until focus confirmation then press all the way? >> >> Sometimes, I'll

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Bruce Walker
Larry answered: > I asked: >> Larry Colen wrote: >>> hitting the focus lock too early >> >> Can you expand on that? Do you not just half-press the shutter release >> until focus confirmation then press all the way? > > Sometimes, I'll prefocus, then hit the AF button to switch to manual focus to

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Larry Colen
On Jan 10, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Don Guthrie wrote: > A little bit of noise looks fine in that type of shpt IMHO. LR can save some > really dark photos, but I think several other shots of that person were > better photos. Yes I went thru the set and I thought you got lots of good > shots. Thanks

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Larry Colen
On Jan 10, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Those shots came out very well indeed, Larry; bassist especially. Thanks > > I'm looking forward to enjoying a K-5 descendent myself one day. The > K-5IIs is on my wishlist, but I'm kinda hoping a 24 Mpx sensor appears > in one by that time. F

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Don Guthrie
scuss Mail List Subject: The K-5 continues to surprise me Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From my experience shooting in very low light, I don't tend to like to push the ISO on the K-5 past 12,800. Sometimes I'll go as high as 16,000 when I don't have any c

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Bruce Walker
Those shots came out very well indeed, Larry; bassist especially. I'm looking forward to enjoying a K-5 descendent myself one day. The K-5IIs is on my wishlist, but I'm kinda hoping a 24 Mpx sensor appears in one by that time. Fortunately for me, wishing and dreaming are budget-friendly activities

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Walt
That is pretty amazing for 25,600! I'm almost looking forward to going to work this weekend and seeing what it'll do in the dim light there. Some of the reviews I've read said the images become pretty much unusable at 12,800 -- but I reckon that depends on what you're using them for. For purely

Re: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread Larry Colen
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:02 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: > focus manually? I've tried that, often with worse luck. Several of mine last night were manual focus. I wish it were easy to sort out my photos in lightroom into manual or auto focus so I could easily compare my success rate with each. --

RE: The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-10 Thread J.C. O'Connell
focus manually? - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Larry Colen Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 2:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: The K-5 continues to surprise me

The K-5 continues to surprise me

2013-01-09 Thread Larry Colen
>From my experience shooting in very low light, I don't tend to like to push >the ISO on the K-5 past 12,800. Sometimes I'll go as high as 16,000 when I >don't have any choice. Last night I was photographing a benefit concert for a >friend whose house had burned down, and when I wasn't using a