COOL..
and here I thought sweat shops and Dickensian workhouses were things that only occured
a long time ago or in 3rd world emerging economies...
oh.. wait... we're in Canada strike that thought *smirk*
Dave
snip
Did you know that the employees are discouraged from speaking to one
On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 12:05 AM, Jim Apilado wrote:
When APS was introduced in 1997, I recall Popular Photography magazine
speculating on whether a 35mm APS system could have come out. I wonder
why
the camera makers and film manufacturers did not come out with a 35mm
APS
system
Message -
From: Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
When APS was introduced in 1997, I recall Popular Photography magazine
speculating on whether a 35mm APS system could have come out. I wonder
why
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Hall
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
I can only speculate that 35mm APS never came out for the
following reasons:
For most 35MM users, APS solved problems no one ever had. What
kind of
second-rate lamers can't either load a film or count
Why do I love the APS format? (I've never actually used the APS
format.) Because when I have prints made from a roll of 35mm film,
the negative numbers end up being printed on the back. (I
understand that this numbering on 35mm negative prints is a
byproduct of using equipment that can also do
Don't forget the free index prints you now get with
35mm to :-)
--- Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do I love the APS format? (I've never actually
used the APS
format.) Because when I have prints made from a
roll of 35mm film,
the negative numbers end up being printed on the
back. (I
Why do I love the APS format? (I've never actually used the APS
format.) Because when I have prints made from a roll of 35mm film,
the negative numbers end up being printed on the back. (I
understand that this numbering on 35mm negative prints is a
byproduct of using equipment that can
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
It just seems to me that APS has arrived about ten years too
late. As a
small and easy to use format for consumer-level cameras, it's
great but
compared to digital it's old news. It's resolution is higher
than
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why I Love the APS Format
Hey Hey..
remember that those numbers don't necessarily
(at least I've never seen
them) on the back of BW film :)
nor do I get index prints perhaps it's time
to start developing my own
huh.. *smirk*
mmm BW
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
On Thursday, March 14, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Brendan wrote:
Thats cause mini labs send BW out to someone else to
do it the old fashioned way.
Naahhh, it's too expensive to proof by hand. Time
Actually, as I've learned recently from Creative Memories
(for whom my wife is now a consultant),
APS film uses a different base than standard neg film.
The net result is that APS negs are designed to outlast
all other types of film.
Is there anyone out there with more information regarding
this
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
Actually, as I've learned recently from Creative Memories
(for whom my wife is now a consultant),
APS film uses a different base than standard neg film.
The net result is that APS negs are designed
(the original
one) more had slide film been introduced.
Jim A.
From: Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:29:44 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why I Love the APS Format
What kind of resolution do you think it takes to do a very good
4 x 6
13 matches
Mail list logo
