Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide Anglers! (Now a few more que

2002-04-28 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Brendan said: > I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last > week once trying to get the CN > tower's refelction in another building, > the film was 200 kodak gold.>> This makes no sense at all. Using the "Sunny 16" rule, the vase exposure would have been 1/250 @ f16.0. Figuring some added brightness, ad

Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide Anglers! (Now a few more que

2002-04-28 Thread Paul Jones
Was the exposure actualy correct though? > I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last > week once trying > to get the CN tower's refelction in another building, > the film was 200 > kodak gold.>> - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the di

Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide Anglers! (Now a few more que

2002-04-28 Thread Pentxuser
I doubt you really even got F22 at 2000 of a second. Chances are the reflection from the snow was throwing your meter off and you really needed to open up 2 or 3 stops to hold the whites in the snow. I'll bet you got blue snow or difficult to print negs. It's extemely rare in nature that there