On 5/11/12, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>THE FIRST 36 HOURS: An inside look at Hurricane Sandy
>
>https://vimeo.com/52760964
Welcome to my world!
Thanks for posting.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--
_
THE FIRST 36 HOURS: An inside look at Hurricane Sandy
https://vimeo.com/52760964
PS for gmail users if you elect to use the new compose window beware
that it defaults to rich text mode ;(
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Face
Thanks for looking and commenting.
Dan
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Some great pics in the July pug. HIghlights for me were Ken Waller and
> Walter Hamler's Blue Angel pics, Christine's shot of a plane ascending into
> the clouds, Robb's seaplane, Ted Beilby's wingwalk
Some great pics in the July pug. HIghlights for me were Ken Waller and
Walter Hamler's Blue Angel pics, Christine's shot of a plane ascending
into the clouds, Robb's seaplane, Ted Beilby's wingwalker and biplane,
Dan Matyola's classic airborne refueling pic, and as an example of a
really ni
Made a quick look and it seems there are no bargians, or even potential
bargains, (and almost no activity).
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Lord knows we need some relief of the rampant fraud and high fees of
> eBay. Don't know if this is the answer but at least someone's trying.
>
> http://www.cameragas.
On 7/11/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lord knows we need some relief of the rampant fraud and high fees of
> eBay. Don't know if this is the answer but at least someone's trying.
>
> http://www.cameragas.com/
>
> >From the site:
>
> "CameraGAS.com is an online Auction and Classified
Lord knows we need some relief of the rampant fraud and high fees of
eBay. Don't know if this is the answer but at least someone's trying.
http://www.cameragas.com/
>From the site:
"CameraGAS.com is an online Auction and Classified Ad site dedicated to
photographic equipment only. It was estab
Mike Wilson wrote:
> http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
>
>
> Shel
I'm impressed with the amount of time and effort spent but if you'd seen this
as a photograph, I think you would not have been very complimentary. No
people, nothing to really focus on.
Lookin
When asked why he climbed Mount Everest, Hillary replied: "Because it was
there".
Asked why he married the Queen (she wasn't at the time), Prince Philip
replied: "Because she was there".
Moral: Never ask why.
John
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:06:04 +0100, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrot
On 5/4/06, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Why swim the English Channel?
Well hold on old boy, let's not get carried away here ...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/05 Wed PM 04:27:59 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Worth a Look
>
> 15,000 layers, 1.7g file. I can't take the time to view it on my slow
> connection, but comments on anothe
Why not? I would like to see this in real live, the web version
doesn't show any detail. The fact that someone spend 2000+ hours
creating a digital painting is fascinating.
Toine
On 4/6/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painti
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Worth a Look
15,000 layers, 1.7g file. I can't take the time to view it on my slow
connection, but comments on another list indicate that it's well worth a
look.
http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monr
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: Worth a Look
why go out and take photos?
Even 4x5 would be instant gratification.
William Robb
why go out and take photos?
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
"It took eleven months (close to 2,000 hours) to create."
Why?
That is, why spend 2,000 hours doing this?)
Joe
I think that's pretty cool.
Why did Da Vinci take 4 years to finish the Mona Lisa? Why does any artist?
Dave S
On 4/6/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
>
>
> "It took eleven months (close to 2,000 hours) to create."
Why climb a mountain? Why swim the English Channel? Why ride a bicycle
across America? Why build a skyscraper? Why, why, why?
Because it's fun?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Jos
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 04:13:42PM -0600, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
>
>
> "It took eleven months (close to 2,000 hours) to create."
>
> Why?
>
> That is, why spend 2,000 hours doing this?)
>
> Joe
Because he can.
I can understa
Labor of love? Hobby? Test one's skill? Learn new techniques? Promote
one's business? I'm surprised you even asked the question
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Joseph Tainter
> http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
>
>
> "It took eleven months (close t
http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
"It took eleven months (close to 2,000 hours) to create."
Why?
That is, why spend 2,000 hours doing this?)
Joe
It's pretty neat.
Godfrey
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
15,000 layers, 1.7g file. I can't take the time to view it on my slow
connection, but comments on another list indicate that it's well
worth a
look.
http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-
15,000 layers, 1.7g file. I can't take the time to view it on my slow
connection, but comments on another list indicate that it's well worth a
look.
http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/04/bert-monroys-monster-painting/
Shel
Okay, heads-up you Pentaxians in the UK and elsewhere,
Spotted fresh in this week's AP (Saturday 9th):
MX black £125, chrome £110
SMC M 15mm f/3.5 £550
24mm f/2.8 £95
28mm f/3.5 SHIFT £470
35mm f/2 £150
50mm f/1.7 £25
75-150mm f/4 £55
85mm f/1.8 £195
K T6 2x £50
UK phone 01992 537464 (Herts, no
Plus there's an LX with 50 1.7 condition unkown for £250 in Scotland.
Phone 0131 667 2164
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This
ative. Seller informed me that the Queen was given one.
Price? Considerably less then what the M6 commemorative sold for.
Jim A.
> From: "jmadams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:42:45 -0800
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> a mere bagatelle! At a Leica specialists in London last year there was
> a Leica formerly owned by Secchiarolo (sp?) the 'original paparazzo'.
> It was on sale for, iirc, GBP£60,000- (sixty thousand). That's close
> to one hundred thousand US dollars. For one camera.
>
> It was on the store's w
I hope HBC has them well insured, or better still in a bank-deposit box!!
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Mustarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Worth a Look
> H
Hi,
a mere bagatelle! At a Leica specialists in London last year there was
a Leica formerly owned by Secchiarolo (sp?) the 'original paparazzo'.
It was on sale for, iirc, GBP£60,000- (sixty thousand). That's close
to one hundred thousand US dollars. For one camera.
It was on the store's website
Sun, 18 Mar 2001 16:16:08 +0100
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Worth a Look
>
> Hi
> Impressing collection!
> I guess this is the guy's pension! Nevetheless, this is not about cameras,
> it's speculation/investment in collectibles. It might as wel
After reading all of that it seems Lieca will make a commemorative camera
for just about anything! They really know how to milk the deep pocketed
collectors I guess.
Todd
At 08:13 AM 3/18/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Geez, where is the great Pentax collection? Looks like Leica has all
>the neat commem
The Pentax collection is now being readied for sale at Wal-Mart.
(Just kidding, just kidding... ;>}
It's nice tho, how all those cute little Leicas all had all those cute
little babies in all their own cute little boxes
And just think, almost all 21 of them have never had their cute lit
Hi
Impressing collection!
I guess this is the guy's pension! Nevetheless, this is not about cameras,
it's speculation/investment in collectibles. It might as well have been
coins or paintings. Theese cameras were made for collectores, not
photographers. I wonder if it has been worth it? BTW, I kno
D]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 8:49 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Worth a Look
> >
> >
> > Yup
> >
> > Went visiting the Leica's this AM a
AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Worth a Look
>
>
> Yup
>
> Went visiting the Leica's this AM and was really impressed!
>
> ...and who bids US$50,000+ on an auction and the
> reserve is still not met.
>
> Regards, Bob S.
>
>
> << G
Yup
Went visiting the Leica's this AM and was really impressed!
...and who bids US$50,000+ on an auction and the reserve is still not met.
Regards, Bob S.
<< Geez, where is the great Pentax collection? Looks like Leica has all
the neat commemoratives.
Bid now - only $50,599.00 and counti
Geez, where is the great Pentax collection? Looks like Leica has all
the neat commemoratives.
Bid now - only $50,599.00 and counting.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1220440728
--
Happy Trails,
Texdance
http://members.fortunecity.com/texdance
http://members1.clubphoto.co
36 matches
Mail list logo
