Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite.
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182
A split ND filter was used to reduce contrast
between the dome and its reflection ...
This was taken during day h
Well done. A very nice capture.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection
> Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
> prints today, it is a scan fr
Thanks Ken!
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 00:05:53 -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>Well done. A very nice capture.
>> Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
>> prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite.
>>
>> http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182
Regard
Very cool!
I think it could be improved by bringing the blue down a bit in curves
and turning up the saturation a tad. That is my default fix-all
adjustment for photos taken in the middle of the day.
Cheers,
Francis
>>Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
>>prints t
Hi Francis,
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 16:56:39 -0700, Francis wrote:
>
>Very cool!
Thanks!
>I think it could be improved by bringing the blue down a bit in curves
>and turning up the saturation a tad. That is my default fix-all
>adjustment for photos taken in the middle of the day.
Hmm, I already
: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection
Well done. A very nice capture.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Yosemite, halfdome plus reflection
> Came across this one while selecting s
Post card shot! Well seen and composed.
I do have a question about focus/aperture. It may be the small file,
the focus in combination with the chosen aperture, my eyes and/or
monitor, but the dome ridge looks sharper than the intervening trees
which, themselves, are a fair distance away.
Does the 6
Hi Jack,
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
>Post card shot! Well seen and composed.
Thanks!
>I do have a question about focus/aperture. It may be the small file,
>the focus in combination with the chosen aperture, my eyes and/or
>monitor, but the dome ridge looks sharpe
Nicely done. It makes me want to be there in person.
Jan van Wijk wrote:
>Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
>prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite.
>
> http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182
>
>A split ND filter was used to redu
I agree with you about Zion and Yellowstone, but would have to put
Grand Teton right next to Yosemite.
Jack
--- Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >Post card shot! Well seen and composed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >I do
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
>I agree with you about Zion and Yellowstone, but would have to put
>Grand Teton right next to Yosemite.
Right, I usually include that in Yellostone trips :-)
Regards, JvW
In a message dated 10/6/2006 11:25:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite.
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182
A split ND filter was used t
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:58:50 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Came across this one while selecting some stuff for large format
>>prints today, it is a scan from a 67 slide taken at Yosemite.
>>
>>http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=182
>=
>Very nice shot. Well done.
Thanks marni
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:10:23 +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
>JvW - you are one lucky guy!
>Great photo!
Thanks Jens!
>The others too!
So I guess you browsed the rest of the gallery too then ?
Just made some updates today to clean up the EXIF
handling that was a bit screwed up in the orinal PHP
code
14 matches
Mail list logo
