RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

Are you still here? :-) Tom C. >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" >Subject: RE: a flower for Shel - GDG >Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:49:48 -0400 > >

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

If you cant do it, teach it. If you cant teach it, teach gym! JCO -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 3:25 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG - Original

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

- Original Message - From: "graywolf" > Hum...? Something to that. So, how do you teach someone that here on the > list? That is your argument, that your 25 years gives you somehow, > magically, I guess, the ability to tell folks how to do things better > than someone who does not have

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Hum...? Something to that. So, how do you teach someone that here on the list? That is your argument, that your 25 years gives you somehow, magically, I guess, the ability to tell folks how to do things better than someone who does not have all that experience. You know what, Bill? I am a lousy

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

- Original Message - From: "graywolf" Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > You are an idiot, Bill. Kinder words, you have never spoken.. You need to use all caps for this sort of thing to be effective though. > > What I said and you know damn well what I me

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:36 AM, graywolf wrote: > You are an idiot, Bill. > .. So, Bill, you can not tell me nothing, I have been around 63 > years and > have forgotten most of what I knew when I was 16, when I knew > everything. ... Like the english language, I guess. Another one for the nonexiste

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Anyway, I was in the photofinishing business for two and a half of >the years I lived in Santa Cruz, CA. Monday mornings we'd get the >weekend's D&P business. More than 30% of the photos were of damn >sunsets, the majority of the rest were of babies, kids, and >gra

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

No mention of horses in thi sentire thread. Whoo Hoo. I still have hope. Dave On 4/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not > > "scientific." Greywolf is

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

ng. Like you do today... - William Robb wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Roberts" > Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > > > >> The lab/camera shop at which I worked a couple of years ago tended to >> support the "babies as most p

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not > "scientific." Greywolf is absolutely correct in his contention > Of > course, over the years, in many areas, we've seen the scientific > evidence > means less than squ

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Bill, Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not "scientific." Greywolf is absolutely correct in his contention Of course, over the years, in many areas, we've seen the scientific evidence means less than squat. Shel > [Original Message] > From: William Robb > > T

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

- Original Message - From: "graywolf" Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > Ahh..., Mark? You said it was digital that put them out of business... > You need to reread his post. He didn't say anything about what put them out of business. William Robb >>

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > > The lab/camera shop at which I worked a couple of years ago tended to > support the "babies as most popular subject matter" theory. The owner > said their prime customer

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

graywolf wrote: >Mark Roberts wrote: >> The lab/camera shop at which I worked a couple of years ago tended to >> support the "babies as most popular subject matter" theory. The owner >> said their prime customer was a woman with a baby stroller. In fact, >> there was a children's clothing store

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Ahh..., Mark? You said it was digital that put them out of business... Mark Roberts wrote: > P. J. Alling wrote: > >> Shel Belinkoff wrote: >>> I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with >>> people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject > they get

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

P. J. Alling wrote: >Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with >> people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get >> are babies and - believe it or not - cats. >> >The most popular "excuses" for photography are wome

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

o: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > > > > Looks like we found the root to all the pdml problems > > > > Dave > > You know what happens when people shoot their mouth off without thinking. > Leaf it alone, bud. &g

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

> > From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/04/22 Sun PM 10:52:15 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > > Looks like we found the root to all the pdml problems > > Dave You know w

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I feel so ... special ;-)) > > A rose by any other name... Is Elwood?? Dave > > ;-) > > -frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Looks like we found the root to all the pdml problems Dave On 4/19/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see my flower for shel has brought about a bouquet of responses. > > G > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

s for sharing ... Shel > [Original Message] > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Date: 4/22/2007 2:53:21 PM > Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > You can even combine the two, and take pictures of baby cats :-) > >http://www.j

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:20:19AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with > people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get > are babies and - believe it or not - cats. You can even combine the two, and take

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

I would guess the kids, grandkids, and pets. Maybe with camera club types it would be landscapes. Now, old ladies seem to really like taking photos of their flowers. Of course most young men would like to do female nudes. Nowadays, I seem to like shooting the insides of taperecorders . -graywo

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Indeed - I got lotsa cat pics Shel > [Original Message] > From: Digital Image Studio > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > ... In talking with people at a couple of labs here, > > they say the most popular subject they get > > are babies and - believe it or not - cats. > > Available captive target

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

The most popular "excuses" for photography are women and sunsets? Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with > people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get > are babies and - believe it or not - cats. > > Shel > > >

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get are babies and - believe it or not - cats. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The mos popular subjects of all (for

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 22/04/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with > people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get > are babies and - believe it or not - cats. Available captive targets, been there. -- Rob

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

Godfrey DiGiorgi Sendt: 19. april 2007 03:27 Til: PDML List Emne: a flower for Shel - GDG Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than they did with film? I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs nothing to shoot a bunch of them ... http://homepage.mac.com/godders

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

frank theriault wrote: >On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Yes, I feel so ... special ;-)) >> >> > >A rose by any other name... > >;-) > >-frank > > > I spent so much time weeding out those other posts I almost missed the blossoming of this pun thread... Nice pic

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

As well you should. Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Yes, I feel so ... special ;-)) > > Shel > > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi >> > > >> I see my flower for shel has brought about a bouquet of responses. >> > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

lf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:39 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG Sheesh! Most people usually ignore me, now I'm getting flowers. I'm deeply troubled by this recent turn of events Shel > [Original Message] > Fro

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I feel so ... special ;-)) A rose by any other name... ;-) -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Yes, I feel so ... special ;-)) Shel > [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > I see my flower for shel has brought about a bouquet of responses. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

I see my flower for shel has brought about a bouquet of responses. G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

I heard the same thing through the grapevine... Norm Mark Roberts wrote: > Frank's no pansy -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

frank theriault wrote: >On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You really have a prickly attitude. You need a rosier outlook. It seems >> you're always vining about one thing or another. Anyway, this isn't >> geranium to the original thread. > >I know you'd like to get me off

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

This thread is the pits! However, Norm, it's good to see you raison to the occasion. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Norm Baugher > Mark, you're such a prune... > Norm > > Mark Roberts wrote: > > "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You really have a prickly attitude. You need a rosier outlook. It seems > you're always vining about one thing or another. Anyway, this isn't > geranium to the original thread. I know you'd like to get me off the list, but let me tell you,

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Is that comment stamen from your insecurities? Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank theriault > Or I could just pistil whip him... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Mark, you're such a prune... Norm Mark Roberts wrote: > "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? >>> You've always been a thorn in my side! >>> > > Wow

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't worry Frank, just weed out Shel's posts... Or I could just pistil whip him... -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

"frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? >> >> You've always been a thorn in my side! > Wow Frank. You really rose to the occasion with that one. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDM

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

You really have a prickly attitude. You need a rosier outlook. It seems you're always vining about one thing or another. Anyway, this isn't geranium to the original thread. Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank theriault > On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > Does this stem from your in

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's all stop and smell the cliches. Are you trying to plant the seeds of discontent? -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Don't worry Frank, just weed out Shel's posts... Norm frank theriault wrote: > On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? >> > > Shel, > > You've always been a thorn in my side! > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

-- Original message -- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? > > Shel, > > You've always been a thorn in my side! > > ;-) > Let's all stop

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? Shel, You've always been a thorn in my side! ;-) cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > On 4/19/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I was going to send you flowers too, but you don't like my flower

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns? Shel > [Original Message] > From: frank theriault > > So are you going to petal them elsewhere? > > Nah, I'm just going to leave it for now... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was going to send you flowers too, but you don't like my flower shots... > > So are you going to petal them elsewhere? Nah, I'm just going to leave it for now... -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson --

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

> I was going to send you flowers too, but you don't like my flower shots... So are you going to petal them elsewhere? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > On 4/19/07, Shel

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Paul, if this were mine I'd crop some of the background off the top. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Paul Sorenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: a flower for Shel - GDG > 'Nother one... > > http://www.studio1941.com/chicago_aug_2006

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sheesh! Most people usually ignore me, now I'm getting flowers. I'm > deeply troubled by this recent turn of events > I was going to send you flowers too, but you don't like my flower shots... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bour

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

Sheesh! Most people usually ignore me, now I'm getting flowers. I'm deeply troubled by this recent turn of events Shel > [Original Message] > From: David Savage > ...and another: > > > > My, isn't Shel a popular fellow ;-) -

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

On 4/18/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than > they did with film? > > I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs nothing to shoot a > bunch of them ... > >http://homepage.mac.com/godders/flower-for-shel.jpg > >

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

TECTED] On > Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi > Sent: 19 April 2007 02:27 > To: PDML List > Subject: a flower for Shel - GDG > > Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than > they did with film? > > I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

...and another: My, isn't Shel a popular fellow ;-) Cheers, Dave On 4/19/07, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'Nother one... > > http://www.studio1941.com/chicago_aug_2006/ds2_imgp0830.htm > > -P > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >

Re: a flower for Shel - GDG

'Nother one... http://www.studio1941.com/chicago_aug_2006/ds2_imgp0830.htm -P Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Awww, shucks ... > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > >> Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than >> they did with film? >> >> I du

RE: a flower for Shel - GDG

Awww, shucks ... Shel > [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than > they did with film? > > I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs nothing to shoot a > bunch of them ... > >http://homepage.mac.com/godders/

a flower for Shel - GDG

Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than they did with film? I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs nothing to shoot a bunch of them ... http://homepage.mac.com/godders/flower-for-shel.jpg ;-) Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http