Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Alan Chan
Without surprise consider the focusing mechanisms of most FA lenses (including some * lenses) were designed and manufactured to be loose so they could AF faster. If the glasses can move up & down, they can't be perfectly calibrated, or can they??? Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Andre Langevin
This M thread keeps jumping from a subject to another! As this one is still hot, may I clarify one point: First, a great many M lenses were identical optically to either the preceding K lens, or to the following A lens, so I don't think that in those (many) cases anybody can credibly claim that

Re: anti-M arguments

2004-03-03 Thread Mark Cassino
At 11:35 PM 3/2/2004 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >First, a great many M lenses were identical optically to either the > >preceding K lens, or to the following A lens, so I don't think that in > >those (many) cases anybody can credibly claim that the Ks or As were better. They CAN'T be iden