On 11-07-17 11:52 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Hi Dario,
Thanks for your many replies! :)
I think you were on track in your first reply -- it was still very
bright out, and the camera, set to AV, wanted a fast shutter speed
(1/500 +), even at ISO 200. After my first shot, I smacked my
forehea
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Can we talk about fill flash & pttl?
Mark, thank you very much for your thoughts. It's encouraging to know
that you are able to make pttl work for you, even at close range...
Your comment:
On overcast cloudy days I may set the flash
: Christine Nielsen
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Can we talk about fill flash & pttl?
Hi Dario,
Thanks for your many replies! :)
I think you were on track in your first reply -- it was still very
bright out, and the camera, set to AV, want
Hi Dario,
Thanks for your many replies! :)
I think you were on track in your first reply -- it was still very
bright out, and the camera, set to AV, wanted a fast shutter speed
(1/500 +), even at ISO 200. After my first shot, I smacked my
forehead and realized high speed synch would be the way
it's own quirks and I had to adjust the
> exposure
> compensation for each. I find that I dial in much more negative compensation
> with
> the K7 than I did with any of the other cameras.
> Good
> luck!
> MCC
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Chr
Christine,
In case of low-light shooting, I find the best way for using flash is to
set the camera in M mode for exposing the environment and then add some
flash for the main subject in the foreground. Also try spot metering,
especially in case of a small subject against a wide underexposed
ba
Christine,
In case of low-light shooting, I find the best way for using flash is to set
the camera in M mode for exposing the environment and then add some flash
for the main subject in the foreground. Also try spot metering, especially
in case of a small subject against a wide underexposed bac
I wrote:
Christine, I don't think the P-TTL works perfectly (far from that!), but
the bad problem you are reporting usually happens when you use aperture
priority and have aperture & ISO settings so that he camera would use fast
shutter speeds (e.g. 1/500 sec) in bright sunlight. At that point
Christine Nielsen wrote:
Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
beach, at the end of the day. It was still very bright, and in the
shade of a lighthouse, some fill was required on our models' faces.
No problem. I had the AF540 on my k-7...using aperture priority
d that I dial in much more negative compensation
with
the K7 than I did with any of the other cameras.
Good
luck!
MCC
- Original Message -
From: Christine Nielsen
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:11 AM
Subject: Can we talk about fill flash & pt
I was using the DA* 50-135...
-c
On Jul 14, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
> Hi Christine,
>
> Can I ask what lens you were using? I had this sort of problem using
> an A lens. It improved when I set the focal length for the shake
> reduction (don't ask me why), though it was still not
Hi Christine,
Can I ask what lens you were using? I had this sort of problem using
an A lens. It improved when I set the focal length for the shake
reduction (don't ask me why), though it was still not correct it was
then controlable.
Leon
On 14 July 2011 01:11, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> Las
icago
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Nielsen"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Can we talk about fill flash & pttl?
Thanks for your reply, Godfrey. Everything you said syncs with
everything I've been ta
From: Christine Nielsen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
The other problem I've had with the AF540 is you can't set it the way you
want it and have it stay there. If it powers down, it reverts to full power
when you wake it back up.
Funny, there's a problem I haven't had
I usuall do fill flash the old fashioned way, because you know, there's
no sensors to get confused and screw up exposure.
On 7/13/2011 11:11 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
beach, at the end of the day. It was still very brigh
I've been less than happy with the LumiQuest Softbox III. It's harsh as an
on-camera diffuser with a hot spot in the middle. For on-camera I much prefer
the Omni-Bounce, with the flash head tilted up at 45 degrees or the
Lightsphere.
Paul
On Jul 13, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> Distance may have been a factor. We were in fairly tight quarters,
> huddled in the shade of the lighthouse...
>
> Bear with me for one more question? When you say "diffuser", what do
> you mean in this situation? I use diffusers all
On 11-07-13 2:50 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Bear with me for one more question? When you say "diffuser", what do
you mean in this situation? I use diffusers all the time with
off-camera flash, but on-camera, what do you prefer? I have resisted
purchasing the sto-fen/tupperware-type accessorie
The ceiling can be used as a diffuser, and there are diffusers that clip onto
the flash or fit over the head. The 540 also has a mini bounce card and
diffuser built in. But I use a Sto-Fen Omni-Bounce most of the time for any
work where I'm closer than 15 feet or so.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're doing wrong, but I usually have no problem getting
> the AF540 to work as fill. In daylight, you do have to use high speed synch
> mode of course, and the flash will revert to a 1/180th shutter speed if you
> don'
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> And it's worth noting that these flashes, when set to wireless slaves, will
> not power off until after an hour of non-use. So you don't tend to ever see
> the "revert to default P-TTL" behaviour when working with remotes.
>
> Think of it
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2011, Christine Nielsen wrote:
>> ... Is 'zactly what I did. (manual exposure/ pttl flash/ -1.5 to -2EV/ hss
>> was one of my iterations) Still, I got uneven results. Now, maybe I
>> still goofed in setting the fl
On 11-07-13 1:15 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:05, Christine Nielsen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
The other problem I've had with the AF540 is you can't set it the way you
want it and have it stay there. If it powers down, it reverts to fu
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:05, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>>
>> The other problem I've had with the AF540 is you can't set it the way you
>> want it and have it stay there. If it powers down, it reverts to full power
>> when you wake it back u
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> ... Is 'zactly what I did. (manual exposure/ pttl flash/ -1.5 to -2EV/ hss
> was one of my iterations) Still, I got uneven results. Now, maybe I
> still goofed in setting the flash EV in camera rather than on the
> unit... or in any number
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> The other problem I've had with the AF540 is you can't set it the way you
> want it and have it stay there. If it powers down, it reverts to full power
> when you wake it back up.
>
Funny, there's a problem I haven't had. I often use my
I'm not sure what you're doing wrong, but I usually have no problem getting the
AF540 to work as fill. In daylight, you do have to use high speed synch mode of
course, and the flash will revert to a 1/180th shutter speed if you don't
override it. I generally use program "P" mode on the K-5 and s
Thanks for your reply, Godfrey. Everything you said syncs with
everything I've been taught about using flash... And your
recommendation:
> When I do use TTL flash automation systems for fill flash, I find the
> only way to get consistent results with almost any camera and flash
> system is to:
>
On 13/07/2011 9:11 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Pentax TTL flash control has always been pretty awful. To this day, I
still set everything manually and use a big dumb auto flash that uses a
PC cord to attach to the camera.
It's sad when a 25 year old flash using 60
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:57, David J Brooks wrote:
> Therefore when flash is needed for any of my photos the D200 and SB800
> come along. Even the D200 pop up is more accurate than the Pentax
> system IMO.
>
Frankly, even the K-7 popup is more accurate in fill-flash conditions than the
AF540 (on t
I see questions like this quite often when I'm teaching workshops,
from people with all different kinds of camera-flash systems.
If you want to understand using a dedicated, auto-metering flash
system like this, see Joe McNally's books, workshops and videos.
They're based on Nikon equipment and th
What shutter speed did the camera select. My habit is setting the sync
to slow speed sync or the camera in M mode. If the meter wants 1/60
and the sync speed is normal the camera selects 1/125 or 1/180 and the
flash suddenly is the primary light source.
Toine
On Wednesday, 13 July 2011, Christine
I have/had the same problems with my K10D. Each shot was different and
i spent more time fiddling that shooting.
The CLS system Nikon has works a lot better for me with way less
fiddle time. Usually set and shoot.
Therefore when flash is needed for any of my photos the D200 and SB800
come along. E
From: Christine Nielsen
Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
beach, at the end of the day. It was still very bright, and in the
shade of a lighthouse, some fill was required on our models' faces.
No problem. I had the AF540 on my k-7...using aperture priority m
Hi Christine, I too have been frustrated with fill flash on my K20D,
whether using the Built-in flash, or the Metz 58AF-1 (some say better
than the Pentax AF540FGZ) or the Quantaray QTB-9550D w/Promaster
5050DXR PTTL module.
In fact the Built-in flash gave better results in the Green Mode on my K20
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>
> Much my experience as well, sadly. I think the problem is that we're using
> Pentax gear. :-(
>
> k7 is much BETTER than the K10D for this kind of thing, but it is still far
> from perfect. I have the same combo with the same prob
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> But where were you applying the -1.5 comp: on the K-7 itself (ie in the
> flash menu), or on the back of the flash? This makes a big difference. I
> find that applying exp comp on the flash generally works better then on the
> camera.
I
On 11-07-13 11:11 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
beach, at the end of the day. It was still very bright, and in the
shade of a lighthouse, some fill was required on our models' faces.
No problem. I had the AF540 on my k-7...us
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:11, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
> beach, at the end of the day. It was still very bright, and in the
> shade of a lighthouse, some fill was required on our models' faces.
> No problem. I had the AF540 on
Last night, I attended a "portrait workshop". We were shooting at the
beach, at the end of the day. It was still very bright, and in the
shade of a lighthouse, some fill was required on our models' faces.
No problem. I had the AF540 on my k-7...using aperture priority mode,
and -1.5 Flash EV, I
40 matches
Mail list logo