Shutter jello?
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Sent: March 23, 2013 3/23/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: considering upgrading
The 2-bits gives a lot more data in RAW. 12 vs 14-bit asides, I'm with
Aahz. The k-30 just isn't
---
From: Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Sent: March 23, 2013 3/23/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: considering upgrading
The 2-bits gives a lot more data in RAW. 12 vs 14-bit asides, I'm with
Aahz. The k-30 just isn't as fully featured as the k-5. The top plate
A link on the subject of K-30 vs K-5
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/42007067
Keep in mind that the K-5 was a flagship product, while the K-30 is a
high end entry level. The K-5 maintains the following advantages:
1) faster FPS burst
2) metal body
3) top lcd
4) a few more dedicated
I'm leaning toward a K30.
But I'm also curious ... would you prefer a good used K5 over a K30? Why or
why not?
I'd like the extra 2 bits of depth, but even then is it that critical?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I'm leaning toward a K30. But I'm also curious ... would you prefer a
good used K5 over a K30? Why or why not? I'd like the extra 2 bits
of depth, but even then is it that critical?
You must have missed my post a few weeks ago, I really
The 2-bits gives a lot more data in RAW. 12 vs 14-bit asides, I'm with
Aahz. The k-30 just isn't as fully featured as the k-5. The top plate
LCD is extremely useful and negates use of the back screen a lot, so
you can turn it off and save battery. For me it was the bracketing.
The k-30 is only
6 matches
Mail list logo
